Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

You’re on a plane. A situation is brewing ...

You have a camera. Do you record?

- By Andrea Sachs

The Washington Post

Chicago aviation police drag a bloodied man down the aisle of a United plane. A mother clutching her baby weeps after a scuffle with an American Airlines flight attendant. A Transporta­tion Safety Administra­tion officer prods a teenage boy during a security patdown at Dallas/Fort Worth. Fists fly at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood after Spirit cancels dozens of flights.

Since the start of the year, the collection of videos documentin­g altercatio­ns between airline personnel and customers has surpassed the number of movies in the “Rocky” franchise. The most recent addition: Navang Oza’s 13minute reel of his spat with a United ticketing agent in New Orleans.

“We’re in the midst of a social revolution driven by the fact that everyone has a camera phone in their pocket,” said Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union. “People are challengin­g authority in new ways.”

Not so long ago, only immediate bystanders would have witnessed these alarming events. Today, millions of eyes are watching the incidents up close and on repeat. The critical question: Should you press the record button or duck behind the in-flight magazine? Many experts say “press.”

Amitai Etzioni, a sociology professor at George Washington University, says the public has a moral obligation to document injustices.

“You cannot look away or ignore,” he said. “At least recordit and share it.”

Several recent passenger videos have spurred change. After the bumping incident, United and other carriers added consumerfr­iendly provisions to their overbookin­g policies. American suspended its belligeren­t crew member. The TSA worked with the mother of the teenager to update its online materials on traveling with children.

On its website, the ACLU explains the right to record: “Taking photograph­s and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constituti­onal right — and that includes transporta­tion facilities.”

Publicly owned airports fall under this purview, although Mr. Stanley added that the courts have not fully tested the constituti­onality of this rule, especially in relation to airports operated by publicpriv­ate partnershi­ps.

Planes are trickier beasts. The airlines own the aircraft, but Mr. Stanley explains that planes are “common carrier conveyance­s and otherwise highly regulated spaces.” He said that he can’t imagine the airlines prohibitin­g passengers from using their cellphones; administer­ing such a ban, he said, would be fruitless.

The carriers publish their guidelines on personal electronic­s in their in-flight magazines or on their websites. The language varies little between carriers.

Southwest: “Want to photograph and/or record Southwest Airlines Customers or Employees? Let them know first! The use of cameras and mobile devices is permitted onboard to capture personal events but can never interfere with the safety of a flight and should always respect others’ privacy.”

United: “The use of small cameras or mobile devices for photograph­y and video is permitted on board, provided that the purpose is capturing personal events. Photograph­ing or recording other customers or airline personnel without their express consent is prohibited.”

Since the recent spate of high-profile videos, the airlines have started to reexamine their guidelines. An American spokesman, for instance, said that the airline could loosen its stance on video. In addition, he said that the carrier expects passengers will share their experience­s on social media, even ones that may ding the company’s armor.

If you happen to find yourself in the vicinity of a troubling situation, proceed with caution: You do not want to escalate the situation or jeopardize your safety or that of others.

“Use the tool after careful considerat­ion of the circumstan­ces,” said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. “You could become a target of the violence.”

“Filming an incident of violence can put both the victim and the filmer at risk by exposing their location, identities and sensitive personal informatio­n,” said Jackie Zammuto, U.S. program manager at the site. “Put yourself in their shoes and think about what it might feel like to have this incident witnessed not only by people on the plane but by millions more online.”

In short, think before you share.

“We’re all publishers now and we have ethical responsibi­lities,” Mr. Jaffer said, “even on social media.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States