Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Concerns over overhaul increase

GOP’s health care bills threaten huge disruption­s across the system

- By Noam N. Levey Tribune Washington Bureau (TNS)

WASHINGTON — Congressio­nal Republican­s, who for years blasted the Affordable Care Act for disrupting Americans’ health care, are now pushing changes that threaten to not only strip health coverage from millions, but also upend insurance markets, cripple state budgets and drive medical clinics and hospitals to the breaking point.

President Donald Trump and GOP leaders have touted their bills to repeal the health care law — one passed by the House last month and a Senate version announced last week — as a necessary fix to problems created by the Affordable Care Act.

But in physicians’ offices and medical centers, in state capitols and corporate offices, there are growing fears that the unpreceden­ted cuts proposed in the GOP legislatio­n would create even larger problems in the U.S. health care system.

“These reductions are going to wreak havoc,” said Tom Priselac, chief executive of Cedars Sinai Health System in Los Angeles, one of the country’s leading medical centers. “It will be a tragic step backward not just for the people most affected, but for the country as a whole.”

Mr. Trump sounded a very different note in his weekly radio address Saturday, pledging anew to save Americans from rising health care costs he blames on the Affordable Care Act. “The American people are calling out for relief, and my administra­tion is determined to provide it,” he said.

Even supporters acknowledg­e that the current law needs adjustment­s, especially to insurance markets, where premiums have risen sharply in recent years and many insurers have pulled out.

But there are few indication­s the GOP repeal bills would bring much stability.

The nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office estimated that the House repeal bill, which Mr. Trump celebrated in a Rose Garden ceremony last month, would nearly double the number of Americans without health coverage over the next decade, pushing the ranks of the uninsured to more 50 million.

And the Senate bill, which includes even deeper cuts over time, would be unlikely to be much less disruptive.

The cascading effects of such a retrenchme­nt would reach far beyond those who lose coverage, according to doctors, hospital leaders, insurance executives, patient advocates and state officials across the country. To date, no leading patient group or physicians organizati­on has supported the GOP repeal bills.

Governors and state legislator­s, facing huge reductions in federal Medicaid funding, may soon have to decide whether to reduce services, limit who can enroll in the health care safety net or make cuts to other state programs, such as education or transporta­tion.

On Friday, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, a Republican who expanded his state’s Medicaid program through the Affordable Care Act, said the Senate bill would cost Nevada nearly half a billion dollars.

“That’s a cost that the state cannot sustain,” he said.

And though the Medicaid cuts may be phased in over several years, many states that have two-year budgets would have to begin confrontin­g the cuts sooner.

Overall, the House bill slashes more than $800 billion in federal Medicaid spending over the next decade, according to the CBO, slashing close to a quarter of federal aid for a program that now covers more than 70 million poor Americans.

The extent of the cuts in the Senate bill is still unclear, but the Senate version caps federal Medicaid spending even more aggressive­ly over time than the House legislatio­n, fundamenta­lly changing the program’s coverage guarantee.

Over the past half-century, the federal government has paid a share of all medical costs incurred by Medicaid patients. But under the GOP plans, that funding would be replaced by fixed payments to states, regardless of what it costs to care for patients.

Under the Senate plan, because that cap would increase only at the rate of inflation, states might bear a growing share of medical costs, which have historical­ly increased faster than inflation.

In addition to the Medicaid reductions, the House and Senate repeal bills would dramatical­ly scale back financial assistance to low- and moderate-income Americans who buy health plans on Affordable Care Act insurance marketplac­es.

Those cuts would make health coverage substantia­lly more expensive for many consumers, forcing some to drop their insurance coverage altogether, independen­t analyses, including from the CBO, have concluded.

Those coverage losses, in turn, will put new pressures on doctors, clinics and hospitals as they face growing numbers of patients with no insurance who are unable to pay their medical bills.

Marshfield Clinic, a large health system that serves more than 2 million patients in central Wisconsin, is anticipati­ng that passage of the GOP plan would lead to a major increase in the amount of care it would have to provide for free, said Susan Turney, the system’s chief executive.

At Valley Health, a network of clinics serving mostly poor patients in West Virginia, southern Ohio and eastern Kentucky, fewer patients with insurance would probably force cutbacks in services, such as extended pediatric hours that allow working parents to bring in sick children evenings and weekends.

“There will be kids and families that will suffer, and the health care in our communitie­s will suffer,” said Valley Health CEO Steve L. Shattls.

 ?? Scott Olson/Getty Images ?? Demonstrat­ors protest changes to the Affordable Care Act on Thursday in Chicago.
Scott Olson/Getty Images Demonstrat­ors protest changes to the Affordable Care Act on Thursday in Chicago.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States