Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

No clear path for GOP after latest repeal effort fails

- By Alan Fram and Erica Werner

WASHINGTON — The resounding Senate crash of the seven-year Republican drive to scrap the Obama health care law incited GOP finger-pointing Friday, but left the party with wounded leaders and no evident pathway forward on an issue that won’t go away.

In an astonishin­g cliffhange­r, the GOP-run Senate voted 51-49 to reject Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s lastditch attempt to sustain their drive to dismantle President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul with a starkly trimmed-down bill. The vote, which concluded shortly before 2 a.m., was a blistering defeat for President Donald Trump and Mr. McConnell, R-Ky., who’ve made uprooting the statute a top priority.

“They should have approved health care last night,” Mr. Trump said Friday during a speech in Brentwood, N.Y. “But you can’t have everything,” he added, seemingly shrugging off one of his biggest legislativ­e setbacks.

Mr. Trump reiterated his threat to “let Obamacare implode,” an outcome he could

hasten by steps like halting federal payments to help insurers reduce out-of-pocket costs for lower-earning consumers.

Senate Democrats were joined in opposition by three Republican­s — Maine’s Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Arizona’s John McCain. The 80-year-old Mr. McCain, just diagnosed with brain cancer, had returned to the Capitol three days earlier to provide a vote that temporaril­y kept the measure alive, only to deliver the coup de grace Friday.

“3 Republican­s and 48 Democrats let the American people down,” Mr. Trump tweeted Friday. He tweeted later that the Senate needed a rules change to “immediatel­y go to a 51 vote majority, not senseless 60,” even though on the crucial vote a simple majority of 51 votes, including a tiebreaker by Vice President Mike Pence, was all that was needed.

“Hello, he only needed 51 in the health care bill and couldn’t do it,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., reminded reporters.

Earlier in the week, Republican defections sank two broad GOP efforts to scrap the 2010 law. One would have erased Mr. Obama’s statute and replaced it with a more constricte­d government health care role, and the other would have annulled the law and given Congress two years to replace it.

The measure that fell Friday was narrower and included a repeal of Mr. Obama’s unpopular tax penalties on people who don’t buy policies and on employers who don’t offer coverage to workers. Mr. McConnell designed it as a legislativ­e vehicle the Senate could approve and begin talks with the House on a compromise bill.

But the week’s setbacks highlighte­d how, despite years of trying, GOP leaders haven’t resolved internal battles between conservati­ves seeking to erase Mr. Obama’s law and moderates leery of tossing millions of voters off of coverage.

“It’s time to move on,” Mr. McConnell said after the defeat.

Friday morning, House leaders resorted to singer Gordon Lightfoot to point fingers. They opened a House GOP meeting by playing “The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald,” a ballad about the 1975 sinking of a freighter in Lake Superior. Lawmakers said leaders assured them it was meant as a reference to the Senate’s flop.

In a statement, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., pointedly said “the House delivered a bill.”

He added, “I encourage the Senate to continue working toward a real solution that keeps our promise.”

Conservati­ve Rep. Mo Brooks, R-Ala., running for a Senate seat, faulted Mr. McConnell for not crafting a plan that could pass. He said if Mr. McConnell abandons the health care drive, “he should resign from leadership.”

One moderate Republican said Mr. Trump shared responsibi­lity.

“One of the failures was the president never laid out a plan or his core principles and never sold them to the American people,” said Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa. “Outsourced the whole issue to Congress.”

Lawmakers spoke of two possible but difficult routes forward.

In one, balking GOP senators could be won over by new proposals from leaders or cave under pressure from angry constituen­ts demanding they fulfill the party’s pledge to tear down Mr. Obama’s law.

In the other, there would be a limited bipartisan effort to address the insurance market’s short-term concerns. That would provide money to insurers to help them subsidize some customers and prevent companies from driving up premiums or abandoning regions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States