Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Sessions order protects religious objectors to LGBT rights

- By Rachel Zoll and Eric Tucker

WASHINGTON — In an order that undercuts protection­s for LGBT people, Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued a sweeping directive to agencies Friday to do as much as possible to accommodat­e those who say their religious freedoms are being violated.

The guidance, an attempt to deliver on President Donald Trump’s pledge to his evangelica­l and other religious supporters, effectivel­y lifts a burden from religious objectors to prove that their beliefs about marriage or other topics are sincerely held.

Under the new policy, a claim of a violation of religious freedom would be enough to override concerns for the civil rights of LGBT people and anti-discrimina­tion protection­s for women and others. The guidelines are so sweeping that experts on religious liberty are calling them a legal powder-keg that could prompt wide-ranging lawsuits against the government.

“This is putting the world on notice: You better take these claims seriously,” said Robin Fretwell Wilson, a law professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. “This is a signal to the rest of these agencies to rethink the protection­s they have put in place on sexual orientatio­n and gender identity.”

Mr. Trump announced plans for the directive in a Rose Garden ceremony in May, surrounded by religious leaders. Since then, religious conservati­ves have anxiously awaited the Justice Department guidance, hoping for greatly strengthen­ed protection­s for their beliefs amid the rapid acceptance­of LGBT rights.

Religious liberty experts said they would have to see how the guidance would be applied by individual agencies, both in crafting regulation­s and deciding how to enforce them. But experts said the directive clearly tilted the balance in favor of people of faith who do not want to recognize same-sex marriage.

“Except in the narrowest circumstan­ces, no one should be forced to choose between living out his or her faith and complying with the law,” Mr. Sessions wrote. “To the greatest extent practicabl­e and permitted by law, religious observance­and practice should be reasonably accommodat­ed inall government activity.”

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservati­ve Christian law firm, called it “a great day for religious freedom.”

The Human Rights Campaign, a national LGBTrights group, called the guidelines an “all-out assault” on civil rights and a “sweeping license to discrimina­te.”

The new document lays the groundwork for legal positions that the Trump administra­tion intends to take in future religious freedom cases, envisionin­g sweeping protection­s for faith-based beliefs and practices in private workplaces, at government jobs, in awarding government grants and in runningpri­sons.

The memo makes clear the Justice Department’s support of the Religious Freedom Restoratio­n Act of 1993 to protect the rights not only of people to worship as they choose but also of corporatio­ns, companies and private firms.

In what is likely to be one of the more contested aspects of the document, the Justice Department states that religious organizati­ons can hire workers based on religious beliefs and an employee’s willingnes­s “to adhere to a code of conduct.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States