Tar Heels moving on from academic case
North Carolina can move forward, closing one of the most embarrassing chapters in the school’s history now that the long-running NCAA academic case has ended with UNC facing no penalty.
Still, even with what had to be the best possible outcome — a weight being lifted that has loomed over the Chapel Hill campus for years — school officials greeted the news more with cautious reliefthan exuberance.
“Thisisn’t a time of celebration,” chancellor Carol Folt said Friday in a conference callwith reporters.
The NCAA said an infractions committee panel determined it “could not conclude” there were academic violations by the school in the scandal focused on irregular courses featuring significant athlete enrollments.
The school had faced five serious charges and the possibility of major sanctions such as postseason bans or vacated wins and championships. Yet thecase full of starts, stops and twice-rewritten charges reached a best-case-scenario conclusion with the panel’s Fridayreport.
“I think it’s important to understand the panel was in no way supporting what happened,” said Southeastern Conference Commissioner Greg Sankey, the panel’s chief hearing officer. “What happened was troubling. And I think that’s been acknowledged by many different parties. But the panel applied the membership’s bylaws to the fact.
“Albeit at times positions shifted and we were skeptical of positions taken, the panel couldn’t conclude violations.”
Ultimately, the panel said it found only two violations: a failure-to-cooperate charge against two people tied to the problem courses in the formerly named African and Afro-American Studies (AFAM)department.
Former AFAM chairman Julius Nyang’oro faces a fiveyear show-cause penalty through2022 in what amounts to the sole penalty imposed in the case. Nyang’oro had refusedto interview with NCAA investigators after the case wasreopened in 2014.
The other person, retired AFAM office administrator DeborahCrowder, initially refused interviews but reconsidered and interviewed with NCAA investigators in May as well as attended the school’s hearing with the panel in August. Crowder — who had enrolled students, distributed assignments and graded many of the papers in the courses — was not punished, but the NCAA said it is making note of her initial lack of cooperation. Elliot Abrams, Crowder’s attorney, said in a statement the ruling affirms her account that she treated allstudents equally.
North Carolina also faced an improper-benefits charge tied to athlete access to the problem courses, while former professor and academic counselor for women’s basketball Jan Boxill was charged with providing improper help on assignments.
“Sometimes the behavior that you’re not proud of just doesn’t quite fit into a bylaw or a rule or something, and that’s what we’ve been talking about for five years,” UNC athletic director Bubba Cunningham said. “We’re not proud of the behavior but we didn’t think it violated the bylaw, and today the Committee on Infractions revealed to us that they came to thatsame conclusion.”