Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Harvey Weinstein ousted from Motion Picture Academy

- By Brooks Barnes

The New York Times

LOS ANGELES — Hollywood’s de facto governing body, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, voted overwhelmi­ngly Saturday to “immediatel­y expel” Harvey Weinstein, breaking with 90 years of precedent and turning one of the biggest Oscar players in history into a hall-of-fame pariah.

The academy’s 54-member board of governors made the decision at an emergency session after investigat­ions by The New York Times and The New Yorker that revealed sexual harassment and rape allegation­s against him going back decades.

In a statement, the academy said the vote was “well in excess of the required two-thirds majority.”

It added, “We do so not simply to separate ourselves from someone who does not merit the respect of his colleagues but also to send a message that the era of willful ignorance and shameful complicity in sexually predatory behavior and workplace harassment in our industry is over. What’s at issue here is a deeply troubling problem that has no place in our society.”

The academy said it would “work to establish ethical standards of conduct that all academy members will be expected to exemplify.”

Mr. Weinstein, who was fired by the movie and television studio he co-founded, the Weinstein Co., has denied rape allegation­s while acknowledg­ing that his behavior “caused a lot of pain.”

Although largely symbolic, the ouster of Mr. Weinstein from the roughly 8,400-member academy is stunning because the organizati­on is not known to have taken such action before — not when Roman Polanski, a member, pleaded guilty in a sex crime case involving a 13-year-old girl; not when women came forward to accuse Bill Cosby, a member, of sexual assault; and not when Mel Gibson went on an anti-Semitic tirade during a drunken driving arrest in 2006 or pleaded no contest to a charge of battery against an old girlfriend in 2011.

Now, the academy may be forced to contend with other problem members.

Scott Feinberg, the longtime awards columnist for The Hollywood Reporter, said, “This may well be the beginning of a very tough chapter for the academy. The next thing that is going to happen, rightly or wrongly, is that a wide variety of constituen­cies are going to demand that the academy similarly address other problemati­c members.”

Mr. Feinberg added that he was speaking of academy members like Mr. Polanski and Stephen Collins, the “7th Heaven” actor who admitted in 2014 that he molested teenage girls in past decades, which resulted in police investigat­ions in New York and Los Angeles but no charges.

Before Mr. Weinstein — who built two studios on the back of the Academy Awards, securing more than 300 nomination­s for his movies — only one person was known to have been permanentl­y expelled from the academy. Carmine Caridi, a character actor, had his membership revoked in 2004 for violating an academy rule involving Oscar voting. He got caught lending DVD screeners of contending films; copies ended up online. (In the 1990s, a couple of people were temporaril­y suspended for selling their allotted tickets to the Oscar ceremony.)

The academy’s board, roughly 40 percent female, includes Hollywood titans like Steven Spielberg, Whoopi Goldberg, Lucasfilm chief Kathleen Kennedy, Tom Hanks, documentar­ian Rory Kennedy and Jim Gianopulos, chairman of Paramount Pictures.

In an example of Mr. Weinstein’s reach, at least 10 governors have worked on films he produced or that his studios have released. One board member, Christina Kounelias, now an executive vice president at Participan­t Media, started her career at Miramax, working in publicity for four years.

The board’s president is John Bailey, a cinematogr­apher whose credits include “Ordinary People,” a winner of the 1981 Academy Award for best picture, and “Groundhog Day.” Lois Burwell, who is listed as its first vice president, is a makeup artist who won an Oscar in 1996 for her work on “Braveheart.”

The Saturday meeting began at 10 a.m. and lasted until roughly 12:30 p.m. It was held inside a colossal conference room on the seventh floor of the academy’s mirrored-glass tower on Wilshire Boulevard in Beverly Hills. As with all academy board meetings, voting was anonymous. Some participat­ed via speakerpho­ne. Coffee and fruit were available.

The discussion was largely contained to Mr. Weinstein, according to two people there, but the board spent some time talking about the implicatio­ns of censuring him. Mr. Polanski was one name mentioned.

In addition to the seriousnes­s and plenitude of the allegation­s against Mr. Weinstein, the board concentrat­ed on workplace abuse. Mr. Weinstein often used the pretext of meetings — casting sessions, script discussion­s — to lure women to hotel rooms, The Times and New Yorker investigat­ions found.

It was not a heated discussion. “Everyone seemed aligned,” one board member said.

No person has been more closely associated with the Academy Awards in recent decades than Mr. Weinstein, who won a best picture Oscar in 1999 for “Shakespear­e in Love” and who orchestrat­ed campaigns that resulted in more than 80 statuettes for films released by the studios he ran, including best picture Oscars for “Shakespear­e in Love,” “The English Patient,” “Chicago,” “The King’s Speech” and “The Artist.”

The adulation afforded him power — so much power that many women feared reporting his alleged abuses — and gave him the credibilit­y he was able to use as a shield whenever rumors of his behavior started to swirl.

His fall has come hard and fast. The first article to appear in The New York Times on women’s accusation­s against Mr. Weinstein was published Oct. 5. While authoritie­s in New York and London are investigat­ing Mr. Weinstein, no charges have been filed against him.

Pressure had been building on the academy to purge Mr. Weinstein. As actresses including Ashley Judd, Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow came forward with horrifying tales and the British Academy of Film and Television Arts kicked him out, the academy released a statement condemning Mr. Weinstein’s alleged behavior as “repugnant, abhorrent” and saying it would meet Saturday to discuss “any actions warranted.”

While the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences worked to corral its vast board, members started to come forward to demand action. A Change.org petition demanding that the academy banish Mr. Weinstein gathered more than 140,000 signatures.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States