Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Report: City set to exit state financial oversight

Pittsburgh has been ‘distressed’ since 2004

- By Adam Smeltz

Pittsburgh’s financial recovery coordinato­rs agree with Mayor Bill Peduto: The city is ready to emerge from state oversight.

In a 33-page report Thursday, two firms guiding the city government’s financial comeback said Pittsburgh should exit distressed status under state Act 47. The recommenda­tion came three days after Mr. Peduto announced that he would seek to remove the designatio­n by early 2018.

“Over time, the city has adopted a series of financial management tools that will guide the decisionma­king of future leaders on fiscal issues to ensure budgetary stability,” the report says. “The city has strategies in place to address its primary legacy costs — employee pensions, retired employee health care and workers’ compensati­on — while maintainin­g its workforce

and increasing the necessary investment in Pittsburgh’s infrastruc­ture.”

The Downtown law firm Eckert Seamans Chernin & Mellott and the advisory firm Public Financial Management in Philadelph­ia penned the report. State officials appointed them as recovery coordinato­rs when Pittsburgh went under Act 47 in 2004. Neither firm immediatel­y commented Thursday evening.

They developed more than 200 steps to reduce or control costs as the city faced a severe financial crisis, including “junk bond” ratings and an annual budget deficit approachin­g $100 million.

State oversight provisions since then have featured the Intergover­nmental Cooperatio­n Authority, which keeps watch over city spending and debt obligation­s. The municipal workforce has decreased by 26 percent while payments toward pension obligation­s have increased. Among the cost controls, Pittsburgh officials restructur­ed benefits to establish or increase employee contributi­ons to health, vision and dental coverage, the recovery coordinato­rs noted.

They also pointed out new union contracts, a “right-sizing” of city services, and cooperatio­n with surroundin­g municipali­ties. Pittsburgh is among few large U.S. cities “to make it through the recent recession with its finances largely intact,” according to the report.

“The city successful­ly balanced its annual budgets and achieved a near-term financial recovery with revenues consistent­ly outpacing expenditur­es,” the coordinato­rs wrote. Their earlier recommenda­tion that Pittsburgh leave Act 47 oversight — in November 2012 — fell flat. In March 2014, C. Alan Walker, then the state secretary of community and economic developmen­t, decided that the city would remain under financial pressed supervisio­n. for a second He amended recovery plan that would keep tackling legacy costs, such as pensions.

Since then, the city has executed that plan and incrementa­lly increased its pension contributi­on, according to the coordinato­rs. The pension contributi­on is on pace to reach an actuary-recommende­d level in 2018.

On Monday, the Peduto administra­tion will introduce legislatio­n to weave responsibl­e fiscal practices into the city code, mayoral spokesman Timothy McNulty said. The proposal includes mandatory standards for fund balances, debt management and realistic revenue projection­s — measures intended to prevent future crises, Mr. Peduto has said.

“We welcome getting out of financiall­y distressed status, but there are reforms that have to be put in place first by City Council,” Mr. McNulty said. Councilwom­an Natalia Rudiak, who chairs the council finance committee, has said it’s necessary to enshrine the provisions. She wants council to vote on them this year. Removal of state oversight should be conditiona­l on that council approval, Mr. Peduto wrote in a letter Monday to Gov. Tom Wolf and Dennis Davin, the state secretary of community and economic developmen­t. The letter marked the city’s formal applicatio­n to conclude designatio­n under Act 47, a law meant to help struggling municipali­ties steady their finances. The Department of Community and Economic Developmen­t is expected to hold a hearing Nov. 28 on the request. Findings will go before Mr. Davin, who will have 60 days to make a decision, according to the department.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States