Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Republican tax bill heading for obstacles in Senate

GOP comes closer to delivering its first big legislativ­e victory for Trump

- By Alan Fram and Marcy Gordon

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Republican­s have stretched closer to delivering the first big legislativ­e victory for President Donald Trump and their party, whisking a $1.5 trillion overhaul of business and personal income taxes through the House. Thorny problems await in the Senate, though.

The House passage of the bill Thursday on a mostly party-line 227-205 vote also brought nearer the biggest revamp of the U.S. tax system in three decades.

But in the Senate, a similar measure received a politicall­y awkward verdict from nonpartisa­n congressio­nal analysts showing it eventually would produce higher taxes for low- and middle-income earners, but deliver deep reductions for those better off.

The Senate bill was approved late Thursday by the Finance Committee and sent to the full Senate on a party-line 14-12 vote. Like the House measure, it would slash the corporate tax rate and reduce personal income tax rates for many.

But it adds a key feature not in the House version: repeal of the Affordable Care Act’s requiremen­t that everyone in the U.S. have health insurance. Eliminatio­n of the so-called individual mandate under the Obama health care law would add an estimated $338 billion in revenue over 10 years that the Senate tax-writers used for additional tax cuts.

The nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office has projected that repeal of the mandate would result in 13 million more uninsured people by 2027, making it a political risk for some lawmakers.

The Senate panel’s vote came at the end of four days of often-fierce partisan debate. It turned angrily personal for chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch, RUtah, as he railed against Democrats’ accusation­s that the legislatio­n was crafted to favor big corporatio­ns and the wealthy.

“I come from the poor people. And I’ve been working my whole stinking career for people who don’t have a chance,” Mr. Hatch insisted.

After the panel’s approval, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declared, “For the millions of hardworkin­g Americans who need more money in their pockets and the chance of a better future, help is on the way.”

The analysts’ problemati­c projection­s for the Senate bill came a day after Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson became the first GOP senator to state opposition to the measure, saying it didn’t cut taxes enough for millions of partnershi­ps and corporatio­ns. With at least five other Republican senators yet to declare support, the bill’s fate is far from certain in a chamber the GOP controls by just 5248.

Even so, Republican­s are hoping to send a compromise bill for Mr. Trump to sign by Christmas.

“Now the ball is in the Senate’s court,” Vice President Mike Pence said after the House vote. Speaking at a conservati­ve Tax Foundation dinner in Washington, Mr. Pence said, “The next few weeks are going to be vitally important and they’re going to be a challenge.”

A White House statement that “now is the time to deliver” also underscore­d the GOP’s effort to maintain momentum and outrace critics. Those include the AARP lobby for older people, major medical organizati­ons, Realtors — and, in all likelihood, every Senate Democrat.

Despite controllin­g both chambers of Congress and the White House, the Republican­s are still smarting from this summer’s crash of their effort to dismantle former President Barack Obama’s health care law. They see a successful tax effort as the best way to avert major losses in next year’s congressio­nal elections. House Republican­s concede they are watching the Senate warily.

“Political survival depends on us doing this,” said Rep. Kevin Cramer, RN.D. “One of the things that scares me a little bit is that they’re going to screw up the bill to the point we can’t pass it.”

The House plan and the Senate finance bill would deliver the bulk of their tax reductions to businesses.

Each would cut the 35 percent corporate tax rate to 20 percent, while reducing personal rates for many taxpayers and erasing or shrinking deductions. Projected federal deficits would grow by $1.5 trillion over 10 years.

As decades of Republican­s have done before them, GOP lawmakers touted their tax cuts as a boon to families across all income lines and a boost for businesses, jobs and the entire country.

“Passing this bill is the single biggest thing we can do to grow the economy, to restore opportunit­y and help those middle-income families who are struggling,” said House Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.

Mr. Ryan also said he would seek to add tax breaks to help Puerto Rico recover from recent hurricanes to a House-Senate compromise.

Democrats said the tax measure would give outs i z e d benefits to the wealthy and saddle millions of moderate-income Americans with tax increases. Among other things, the House legislatio­n would reduce and ultimately repeal the tax Americans pay on the largest inheritanc­es, while the Senate would limit that levy to fewer estates.

The bill is “pillaging the middle class to pad the pockets of the wealthiest and hand tax breaks to corporatio­ns shipping jobs out of America,” declared House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

Thirteen House Republican­s — all but one from high-tax California, New York and New Jersey — voted “no” because the plan would erase tax deductions for state and local income and sales taxes and limit property tax deductions to $10,000. Defectors included House Appropriat­ions Committee chairman Rodney Frelinghuy­sen, RN.J., who said the measure would “hurt New Jersey families.”

Besides Wisconsin’s Mr. Johnson, Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Jeff Flake and John McCain of Arizona, Bob Corker of Tennessee and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska have yet to commit to backing the tax measure.

Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the Senate plan would mean higher taxes beginning in 2021 for many families earning under $30,000 annually. By 2027, families making less than $75,000 would face tax boosts while those making more would enjoy cuts.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States