Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Treasury fund paid $84,000 sexual harassment settlement

- By Elise Viebeck, Michelle Ye Hee Lee and Kimberly Kindy

WASHINGTON — Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, used $84,000 in taxpayer funds to settle with a former aide who sued him for sexual harassment in 2014, The Washington Post confirmed Friday.

Mr. Farenthold is the first member of Congress confirmed to have benefited from a little-known Treasury Department fund created to cover workplace settlement­s involving lawmakers. The congressio­nal Office of Compliance (OOC) disclosed Friday that the fund paid for only one sexual harassment settlement involving a House lawmaker’s office in the past five years, but did not name Mr. Farenthold.

The congressma­n’s former communicat­ions director, Lauren Greene, accused him of making sexually charged comments designed to gauge whether she was interested in a sexual relationsh­ip. She filed a lawsuit after going through the OOC’s counseling and mediation process. Mr. Farenthold denied wrongdoing in the case.

The revelation sheds new light on the secretive process that lawmakers use to settle workplace complaints against them and their aides using public funds. In total, the Treasury fund has paid for settlement­s related to six claims against House members’ offices since 2013, the OOC wrote in a letter Friday to the Committee on House Administra­tion. The five complaints not pertaining to sexual harassment alleged one or more forms of employment discrimina­tion and in some cases, retaliatio­n, the letter stated.

The fund is not the only source of settlement payments for lawmakers accused of misconduct. Members such as Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., have used their office budgets to settle — and conceal — complaints. Settlement­s reached using this method are not tracked, and they are difficult to identify, even in congressio­nal offices’ payment records.

The House Ethics Committee, requesting documents from the OOC, indicated Friday that it will review all formal claims of sexual harassment and other misconduct involving members and employees of the lower chamber.

That review — the committee’s first major action following a public outcry over sexual harassment in Congress — will encompass all current members and employees of the House who have been the subject of complaints, not just those who paid settlement­s through the Treasury fund.

Ethics watchdog groups welcomed the request as a sign the panel might wield its power to address mounting allegation­s of misconduct on Capitol Hill.

“A nice change of pace to see the Ethics Committee asserting its jurisdicti­on,” Meredith McGehee, executive director of Issue One, a nonprofit focused on government ethics, wrote in an email. “Usually they are looking for ways to avoid taking on hard questions, hoping the member leaves or burying the allegation­s until the ‘heat’ goes away.”

Under the law, the executive director of the Office of Compliance has authority to share records of hearings and decisions with the House and Senate ethics committees. The executive director can share all written and oral testimony from hearings and decisions, but not informatio­n discussed in mediation.

Laura Cech, spokeswoma­n for the OOC, said the office’s current officials do not recall ever providing records of hearings or decisions to congressio­nal ethics committees.

It is not clear whether Ethics Committee Chairwoman Susan Brooks, RInd., and ranking Democrat Ted Deutch, Fla., who requested records from the OOC on Friday, plan to make them public or use the informatio­n to investigat­e lawmakers who have been accused of misconduct.

The panel also is probing allegation­s that Mr. Conyers behaved inappropri­ately toward multiple female aides.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States