Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Michael Flynn’s guilty plea is no big deal

Calm down, Democrats; there remains little evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians

- Ed Rogers Ed Rogers is a contributo­r to The Washington Post’s PostPartis­an blog, a political consultant and a veteran of the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush White Houses and several national campaigns. He is the chairman of the lobbying and communicat

Friday’s guilty plea from former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn is a major disappoint­ment for Democrats. Mr. Flynn admitting to having made false statements is nowhere near where the Democrats want this to go. Of course, the story is big and the fact that a former White House official has been charged with anything and pleaded guilty is consequent­ial, but it doesn’t suggest any collusion occurred and it doesn’t even get close to confirming that Donald Trump or his campaign was somehow complicit in a nefarious scheme.

Democrats are already straining themselves trying to suggest that Mr. Flynn’s plea is just the beginning and that there is more to come. But as far as Mr. Flynn is concerned, that is unlikely. It is just wishful thinking on their part. It’s not as though he pleaded guilty only to leave unresolved matters for later.

Commentato­rs are saying Mr. Flynn’s plea couldn’t come at a worse time for the president. As Republican­s are on the brink of passing this administra­tion’s most important legislativ­e initiative with the GOP-led tax reform bill, some in the media have gone so far as to suggest Mr. Flynn’s admission of guilt may disrupt the tax bill’s vote count in Congress. Well, a note to the political geniuses in the liberal mainstream media: There isn’t one Republican member of Congress thinking, “Gee, Flynn pleaded guilty to something or another. Maybe I won’t vote for a tax cut.” It just doesn’t work that way.

Once the dust settles, the Democrats and their media allies will realize that there is nothing more to this story than what Mr. Flynn has admitted to. Commentato­rs are saying Mr. Flynn has agreed to cooperate, as if that is something new. The fact is, there was never a time when Mr. Flynn wasn’t cooperatin­g. He has been a cooperatin­g witness since special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigat­ion began.

The Democrats won’t admit it, but they are throwing in the towel on collusion. Their only choice now is to prop up the convoluted claim of obstructio­n of justice, and that could go on forever. The ordeal may be bothersome for the White House, but it won’t be fatal.

Oh, and by the way, let’s reflect on what has happened in this investigat­ion so far. Paul Manafort and Rick Gates were indicted on matters associated with foreign-agent registrati­on and money laundering that predated any engagement they had with Mr. Trump. Mr. Flynn has pleaded guilty to a crime that occurred after the campaign was over. To be precise, none of this involves the president or his campaign. It’s all ugly and ragged, but this White House has a lot of ugly and ragged.

Even if Mr. Flynn says he was instructed by the president to be in touch with the Russians, so what? All that would mean is the president-elect told his national security adviser to do his job. Don’t be fooled by the breathless, desperate reaction from the usual suspects. As far as the White House is concerned, the Flynn guilty plea is a four on a scale from one to 10.

Sorry, Democrats. The investigat­ions and “collusion” outrage are running out of steam, well short of reaching the president’s doorstep.

 ?? Abaca Press / TNS ?? Former national security adviser Michael Flynn
Abaca Press / TNS Former national security adviser Michael Flynn

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States