Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Transgende­r troop ban set to end Jan. 1

Military moves ahead despite Trump tweet

- By David G. Savage

WASHINGTON — Barring lastminute interventi­on by the Supreme Court, the military’s ban on enlisting transgende­r troops is set to fall next week, despite President Donald Trump’s tweets.

If so, it would be the rare instance of a major change in U.S. military policy that takes place in the face of the opposition of the commander in chief.

But it also was unusual for the president to try to halt a developing policy by issuing a tweet that surprised top officials.

A series of federal judges has rejected the president’s position, most recently with rulings on Friday, and administra­tion lawyers are running out of time to revive the ban before the Pentagon plans to begin accepting transgende­r recruits on Jan. 1.

In July, Mr. Trump tweeted that he had decided he would “not accept or allow transgende­r individual­s to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military.” The tweet came with little, if any, advance consultati­on with military officials, who

“It must be remembered,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said, that the transgende­r individual­s who went to court seek “to serve their nation with honor and dignity, volunteeri­ng to face extreme hardships, to endure lengthy deployment­s and separation from family and friends and to willingly make the ultimate sacrifice of their lives if necessary.”

In response, Justice Department spokeswoma­n Lauren Ehrsam said, “We disagree with the court’s ruling and are currently evaluating our next steps.”

Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, said “we are grateful to the D.C. Court of Appeals for recognizin­g that our plaintiffs simply want to serve their country. … Experience has shown that allowing qualified transgende­r candidates to serve strengthen­s our military and our country.”

RAND had estimated that there were between 1,300 and 6,600 active duty transgende­r service members, Ms. Minter noted.

The administra­tion’s lawyers have argued repeatedly that courts must defer to the president’s judgment on military matters. It would be unusual if they did not file an emergency appeal in the Supreme Court. To prevail, they would have to convince at least five justices that the government would suffer an “irreparabl­e harm” if the ban on enlisting transgende­r personnel ended on Jan. 1.

The Department of Defense has been getting ready for the change. A Dec. 8 memo advised sector and battalion commanders on “transgende­r applicant processing.”

“As always, every applicant will be treated with dignity and respect,” it said, instructin­g commanders that recruits must be addressed by the name and gender pronoun they prefer.

“Applicants will be evaluated per establishe­d DoD standards for the purpose of qualifying for Military Service,” the memo said. “Ultimately, Commanders are responsibl­e for upholding and maintainin­g the high standards of the U.S. military at all times and in all places.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States