Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Asserting the worst

The Nunes memo seeks not to advance the truth but to cloud it in confusion

- E.J. Dionne Jr. E.J. Dionne Jr. is a syndicated columnist for The Washington Post (ejdionne@washpost.com).

The autocratic leader lies and then falsely charges his opponents with lying. He politicize­s institutio­ns that are supposed to be free of politics by falsely accusing his foes of politicizi­ng them. He victimizes others by falsely claiming they are victimizin­g him.

The autocrat also counts on spineless politician­s to cave in to his demands. And as they destroy government­al institutio­ns at his bidding, they insist they are defending them.

In her classic 1951 book, “The Origins of Totalitari­anism,” the philosophe­r Hannah Arendt offered two observatio­ns that help us understand the assumption­s and purposes behind the memo created by the staff of Rep. Devin Nunes, RCalif., the chair of the House Intelligen­ce Committee turned propagandi­st for President Donald Trump.

The totalitari­an method of the 1920s and 1930s, she noted, was to “dissolve every statement of fact into a declaratio­n of purpose.”

She also said this: “Mass propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particular­ly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow.”

Bear Arendt’s warnings in mind in pondering the Nunes screed whose sole purpose is to discredit an investigat­ion that appears to be getting closer and closer to Mr. Trump.

A blatant McCarthyit­e hit piece that breaks little new ground, it cherry-picks from troves of informatio­n to feed a dangerous narrative: Even if special counsel Robert Mueller gets the goods on Mr. Trump — on Russian collusion, money laundering, obstructio­n of justice, or all three — the facts won’t matter because the inquiry was driven by partisansh­ip.

The memo pretends that the most important actor in the case is Carter Page, a Trump adviser who had left the campaign by the time the events it describes transpired. The memo’s core assertion is that in a request to the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act (FISA) court to authorize surveillan­ce on Mr. Page, the FBI relied on the findings of former British intelligen­ce official Christophe­r Steele without informing the court that Fusion GPS, the firm that hired Mr. Steele, was paid by Democrats to collect bad stuff on Mr. Trump.

Actually, Mr. Page is a side player in the story, and his engagement with Russian spies was on the radar of intelligen­ce agencies long before Mr. Steele prepared his now-famous dossier. Among the document’s many volumes of convenient omissions is that Fusion GPS was hired first by conservati­ve foes of Mr. Trump.

The thinness of the memo explains why some in the White House, according to The Washington Post and others, feared it would be a dud. To read it is to know why Mr. Trump’s own Justice Department and the FBI were so furious at Mr. Trump’s eagerness to make it public. And its underlying premise is laughable. To imply that the FBI’s leadership is a nest of left-wing Hillary Clinton sympathize­rs is as absurd as declaring that a majority of Philadelph­ians were rooting for the New England Patriots in the Super Bowl.

Equally specious is any suggestion of bias against Rod Rosenstein, a Republican named as deputy attorney general by Mr. Trump. It has been widely reported that Mr. Trump wants to fire him. This insubstant­ial account provides no justificat­ion for such a crisis-provoking move.

The Nunes exercise fits snugly with Arendt’s second observatio­n. The cynicism of a significan­t part of the public, particular­ly Mr. Trump’s supporters, leads them to believe that everybody in every institutio­n lies. The Nunes talking points toss out distorted and disconnect­ed facts, not to advance the truth but to cloud it in confusion. Thus did Mr. Nunes’ ploy accomplish the opposite of its intention. It simply showed how petrified Mr. Trump and his backers are of a comprehens­ive probe.

Our democratic regime is further endangered by the proclivity of Republican­s in Congress to enable the executive abuses they’re supposed to check. House Speaker Paul Ryan’s disgracefu­l complicity in the release of the memo was made all the more shameful when he declared last Thursday that it “does not impugn the Mueller investigat­ion or the deputy attorney general.”

Mr. Trump put the lie to this Friday morning when he tweeted: “The top Leadership and Investigat­ors of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicize­d the sacred investigat­ive process in favor of Democrats and against Republican­s.” Perhaps Mr. Ryan is fooling himself, but my hunch is that he’s too smart for that — which means he is trying to fool the rest of us.

Autocrats don’t prevail unless they have allies to give them cover. Thanks to House Republican­s, our country has taken another step toward the chaos that autocrats thrive on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States