Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Banning boots for prisoners is not reasonable

-

After an inmate brutally assaulted a correction­al officer at SCI Somerset last week, some have asked for a systemwide ban on work boots in our prisons. The Post-Gazette’s editorial board immediatel­y jumped on the bandwagon, running an editorial titled “Ban the Boots” (March 3), calling the request “eminently reasonable” and suggesting that a ban on boots is a no-brainer.

There are approximat­ely 45,000 men housed in our correction­al facilities in Pennsylvan­ia. Most of them will be released someday. Those men will need to adjust to a world requiring accountabi­lity and responsibi­lity. Transition­ing will be a challenge, given that our prisoners have enormous confines placed uponthem in prison.

A visitor to any state correction­al facility will see most inmates dressed in orange jumpsuits and soft slip-on shoes. These men experience many dehumanizi­ng measures on a daily basis, having virtually all aspects of their daily lives controlled by the state. To allow some basic decencies, like shoes or work boots, especially for those inmates who exhibit accountabi­lity and responsibi­lity, is an important step forward to their successful return to society.

One officer lost his life to a violent offender. That tragedy is one too many, but that should not necessaril­y translate into a wholesale punishment across the system. If we wish to increase safety in our society at large by improving our rates of rehabilita­tion and recidivism, we may want to think twice before leaping to a reactionar­y solution for all. DAVID B. FAWCETT

Oakmont

We welcome your opinion

the Republican playbook to exploit a culture that puts profits above everything, including honor and truth. It has allowed an incompeten­t, unfit, dangerousl­y corrupt, immoral pathologic­al liar to occupy the most powerful office in the world.

How can we stop the complete destructio­n of our democracy? Look in the mirror: You are the weapon, stupid! Wake up before it is too late. THOMAS G. LIEBENGUTH

Jefferson Hills

Political debates can be deceiving because optics often blind us from messages buried beneath double-talk. On Saturday, at the end of WTAE’s debate for candidates in the 18th Congressio­nal District special election, Conor Lamb stated he hopes to take an oath as our congressma­n. He said his oath wouldn’t be one that is Democratic or Republican or about anyone’s agenda because “we’ve had enough of agendas.” What? Although his statement had a collegiate kumbaya tone, it was a glaring revelation of his naivete and lack of readiness for Congress.

Fact: The winner of this race will join his political party and accept its platform, from which an agenda is driven. Deceptivel­y positionin­g himself as independen­t of both parties almost worked until I replayed Mr. Lamb’s answers to previous questions. He proudly endorsed the agenda of Obamacare, more spending, more taxes, legalizing marijuana and paying government to fix society’s problems that were caused by government in the first place.

He’s committed to an agenda, and it’s the same costly agenda voters wildly opposed in November 2016. He said so much about so little because he knows little about the role he seeks. Integrity and experience are the languages voters want, not evasive double-talk. SUSANNA DeJEET

Irwin

The fact that 18th Congressio­nal District candidate Rick Saccone’s ads are almost entirely negative attack ads speaks volumes about his lack of character. Let’s clean up the swamp and send a positive, qualified person to Congress: Vote for Conor Lamb. LISA SCHWERDT

Bethel Park

Hooray for Michael Moser, who took the time to correct the record of a congressio­nal candidate, Conor Lamb (Feb. 23 letter, “These Attacks on Conor Lamb Are Offensive; He Has Integrity”). Mr. Lamb’s record has been misreprese­nted by the National Republican Congressio­nal Committee’s malicious political point of view.

TV stations have a responsibi­lity for what they put on the air. Most voters look for accurate informatio­n in making their decisions. Those ads to which Mr. Moser refers should never have gotten on the air. MARY LARSEN

Mt. Lebanon

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States