Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pitt administra­tor withdrew from troubled UMass chancellor search

- By Bill Schackner

A search for a new chancellor at the University of Massachuse­tts, Boston, that had narrowed to three finalists — including a University of Pittsburgh administra­tor — was scuttled after faculty representa­tives challenged their credential­s andall three withdrew.

Leadership searches on college campuses sometimes fail, and individual candidates have been known to withdraw at the last minute, suddenly altering the trajectory of deliberati­ons.

But the departure of all finalists was an unusual twist in a campus ritual that typically is structured to include representa­tion from all stakeholde­rs, but neverthele­ss often draws complaints that some views —particular­ly those of professors — arenot adequately considered.

In this case, challenges were raised to the finalists and the search process itself.

Among the three finalists was Kathy Humphrey, Pitt senior vice chancellor for engagement, who also is secretary of the board of trustees and an associate professor in the School of Education.

Also on the short list were Peter Lyons, vice provost and dean of Perimeter College at Georgia State University, and Jack Thomas, president of Western Illinois University.

A campus spokeswoma­n at UMass was not immediatel­y available Tuesday for comment, nor was Ms. Humphrey.

UMass acknowledg­ed the failed search in a statement posted to the campus website.

“It is with profound disappoint­ment that I write to inform you that all three finalists recommende­d by the UMass Boston Chancellor Search Committee have withdrawn from considerat­ion, bringing to an unceremoni­ous end a sevenmonth search process,’’ said UMass president Martin Meehan.

He said that after the finalists visited the campus last week, “the UMass Boston Faculty Council decided to take their dissatisfa­ction with the candidates public, questionin­g the personal and profession­al qualificat­ions of three accomplish­ed higher education leaders and demonstrat­ing that the faculty council would not participat­e in the kind of partnershi­p necessary for a new chancellor to succeed.”

All three conveyed “extreme disappoint­ment” and said they were no longer interested in being considered.

Mr. Meehan said the candidates were asked to visit so he could gather confidenti­al feedback from the campus community that would help him decide which name to recommend to the board of trustees.

“I was mortified when the candidates’ commitment and qualificat­ions were questioned in public forums, including the news media and social media,” Mr. Meehan said.

“I have apologized personally to each of them on behalf of the campus community. I know the majority of you do not support the sensationa­lized critiques of these candidates’ profession­al and academic qualificat­ions and accomplish­ments,” his statement said.

The University of Massachuse­tts is the Commonweal­th’s public research university system, and includes UMass Boston and campuses in Amherst, Dartmouth, Lowell and the UMass Medical School in Worcester. UMass Boston has 14,000 undergradu­ates, according to the school’s enrollment management­website.

The unusual outcome has cast a spotlight on the search that extends well beyond Boston. The Chronicle of Higher Education noted that “widespread use of search consultant­s, the decline in shared governance, and the politiciza­tion of higher education have all contribute­d to the marginaliz­ation of faculty input in searches.”

Mr. Meehan said there were calls to reopen the search. But after soliciting views including those of the search consultant, he said he was assured it would be futile to do so at this time. The campus for now will be headed by an interim leader.

“The search just completed was both exhaustive and comprehens­ive. Every avenue was pursued. Both traditiona­l and non-traditiona­l candidates were considered,” he said. “There is no untapped pool of talent awaiting a call.

“But perhaps more significan­t, the very public way this search came to an end, with threefinal­ists all withdrawin­g inthe face of public opposition from members of the campus, renders a new search untenablea­t this time.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States