Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Obama took lying to new levels on Iran

-

WWASHINGTO­N hen it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, the Obama administra­tion increasing­ly appears to have been a bottomless pit of deception.

First, President Barack Obama failed to disclose to Congress the existence of secret side deals on inspection­s when he transmitte­d the nuclear accord to Capitol Hill. (They were only uncovered by chance when then-Rep. Mike Pompeo, RKan., and Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., learned about them during a meeting with Internatio­nal Atomic Energy Agency officials in Vienna.) Then, we learned that the Obama administra­tion had secretly sent a plane to Tehran loaded with $400 million in Swiss francs, euros and other currencies on the same day Iran released four American hostages, which was followed by two more secret flights carrying another $1.3 billion in cash.

Now, in a bombshell revelation, Republican­s on the Senate Permanent Subcommitt­ee on Investigat­ions, led by Sen. Rob Portman, ROhio, have revealed in a new report that the Obama administra­tion secretly tried to help Iran use U.S. banks to convert $5.7 billion in Iranian assets, after promising Congress that Iran would not get access to the U.S. financial system — and then lied to Congress about what it had done. (Full disclosure: My wife works for Mr. Portman).

In July 2015, Obama Treasury Secretary Jack Lew assured the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that, under the nuclear accord, Iran “will continue to be denied access to the [U.S.] financial and commercial market” and that “Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York, hold correspond­ent account relationsh­ips with U.S. financial institutio­ns, or enter into financing arrangemen­ts with U.S. banks.” A few weeks later, one of Mr. Lew’s top deputies, Adam Szubin, used the exact same words in testimony to the Senate banking committee.

But Senate investigat­ors found that on Feb. 24, 2016, the Obama Treasury Department “granted a specific license that authorized a conversion of Iranian assets worth billions of U.S. dollars using the U.S. financial system” — exactly what Messrs. Lew and Szubin said would not happen — including unlimited future Iranian deposits at Bank Muscat in Oman until the license expired.

Not only that, Senate investigat­ors found that officials from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which regulates U.S. banks’ compliance with U.S. sanctions law, “encouraged two U.S. correspond­ent banks to convert the funds.” The report says “both banks declined to complete the transactio­n due to compliance, reputation­al, and legal risks associated with doing business with Iran.”

Then, after issuing the license, the Obama administra­tion explicitly denied to Congress that it had done so. Messrs. Lew and Szubin both failed to disclose the license in congressio­nal testimony while continuing to assert that the Obama administra­tion would not give Iran access to U.S. financial institutio­ns — when they had just tried to do so. And in a June 2016 letter to Sens. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., and Mark Kirk, R-Ill., Treasury officials declared: “The U.S. Department of Treasury is not working on behalf of Iran to enable Iranian access to U.S. dollars elsewhere in the internatio­nal financial system, nor are we assisting Iran in gaining access to dollar payment systems outside the U.S. financial system. The Administra­tion has not been and is not planning to grant Iran access to the U.S. financial system.” This was patently false.

Investigat­ors also found internal State Department emails, in which officials admitted that the Obama administra­tion had “exceeded our JCPOA commitment­s” by authorizin­g Iranian access to U.S. banks. Furthermor­e, the report reveals that the Obama administra­tion put on more than 200 “roadshows” across the world where they encouraged foreign financial institutio­ns to do business with Iran “as long as the rest of the world left the United States out of it.” According to the report, during a roadshow in London, OFAC director John Smith “downplayed the likelihood of any future penalties or fines,” telling the audience “that 95 percent of the time OFAC sees an apparent violation it results in a simple warning letter or no enforcemen­t action.”

In other words, the Obama administra­tion: (1) told Congress it would not allow Iran access to U.S. financial institutio­ns; (2) issued a special license allowing Iran to do exactly that; (3) unsuccessf­ully pressured U.S. banks to help Iran; (4) lied to Congress and the American people about what it had done; (5) admitted in internal emails that these efforts “exceeded” U.S. obligation­s under the nuclear deal; (6) sent officials, including bank regulators, around the world to urge foreign financial institutio­ns to do business with Iran; and (7) promised that they would get nothing more than a slap on the wrist for violating U.S. sanctions.

How bad is this? Remove the words “Obama” and “Iran” and replace them with “Trump” and “Russia” and imagine the outrage that would ensue over the same revelation­s. Democrats would be holding news conference­s, and the story would be front-page news.

We hear a lot these days from the media about the danger of presidenti­al lies. Well, when it comes to the Iran deal, the Obama administra­tion took lying to new heights. And no, that’s not Fake News.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States