Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Senate rejects Toomey’s bill on oversight of trade deals

- By Erica Werner

WASHINGTON - The Senate sided with the Trump administra­tion Thursday to vote down a GOP plan that would have given Congress greater oversight over deals between foreign and U.S. firms that could affect national security.

The legislatio­n, pushed by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., failed to clear a procedural hurdle when the Senate blocked it with a 35-to-62 vote. Sixty “yes” votes would have been required for the measure to advance.

The vote was another instance of the Senate declining to assert authority over Trump administra­tion decision-making on trade issues. Earlier this week, GOP leaders blocked an amendment by Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., that would have given Congress veto power over certain tariff decisions by the administra­tion.

And a fight is looming over the Senate’s attempt to enact penalties opposed by the administra­tion on the Chinese telecommun­ications company ZTE. That legislatio­n has been included in the National Defense Authorizat­ion Act, which is headed toward Senate passage in coming days, but the White House announced that it intends to try to kill the ZTE measure when a final compromise defense bill is written by House and Senate negotiator­s.

The Toomey legislatio­n Thursday involved the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS, an interagenc­y committee chaired by the treasury secretary that conducts national security reviews of attempted takeovers of U.S. firms by foreign companies. Mr. Toomey wanted to give Congress a vote on major CFIUS decisions.

“It’s a simple question of whether we think that we ought to be accountabl­e, that we ought to take authority for the legislativ­e authority we delegate,” Mr. Toomey argued. “A ‘no’ vote is really a vote to shirk our own responsibi­lity.”

But the administra­tion argued that Mr. Toomey’s legislatio­n “could potentiall­y result in CFIUS being unable to establish regulation­s, thereby underminin­g national security.”

Democrats also opposed Mr. Toomey’s move, noting that it derived from a longstandi­ng drive by conservati­ves to rein in the executive branch on various fronts, long-predating the Trump administra­tion and ranging well beyond CFIUS.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States