Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Don’t prejudge Jordan

An accusation comes at a suspect moment

-

U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, the Urbana, Ohio, Republican, who heads the ultra-conservati­ve Freedom Caucus and is a possible candidate for speaker of the House, is either a victim, a liar or a man sinking into the quicksand of confused and conflictin­g memory.

None are good options for an ambitious politician.

And all are real possibilit­ies. Moreover, this accusation comes at a suspect moment — when Mr. Jordan is a lead House investigat­or of abuses of power at the FBI. You have to wonder why these accusation­s came out now.

Let’s not rush to judgment, but let the full story unfold.

Mr. Jordan was an assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State University when a now-dead team doctor, Richard Strauss, is accused of either assaulting or attempting to assault several of the players he treated.

During Mr. Jordan’s tenure as an assistant coach, 1986 to 1994, it was supposedly common knowledge that Dr. Strauss was taking advantage of his position of power by groping and ogling wrestlers sent to him for examinatio­n. Dr. Strauss supposedly spent an inordinate amount of time in the showers and somehow facilitate­d other nonwrestle­rs being in the shower area when they had no business being there.

Eight former wrestlers have now claimed that Mr. Jordan knew about the alleged groping and voyeurism by Dr. Strauss, who was team doctor from the mid-1970s to late 1990s.

Mr. Jordan has adamantly denied knowing about the allegation­s, and he has organized other former coaches, as well as House colleagues, to defend his innocence and his honor.

At the same time, he has said that “Conversati­ons in a locker room are a lot different than people coming up and talking about abuse,” which suggests that he may have heard some talk about the doctor’s behavior, and either did not take it seriously or was unsure of what to do.

That, depending on further fact and context, may well be forgivable. Several of the former athletes have said as much. Not acceptable is Mr. Jordan calling the former wrestlers liars with a political motive, which he has done.

This story echoes other sex abuse stories on American campuses, especially at Penn State under Joe Paterno.

However, there is far more that we do know than what we know at this stage, and it seems both wise and fair for the press and the public not to prejudge this matter but to wait for the official findings of Ohio State, which has launched an investigat­ion. Let’s see what OSU finds. It would be shocking if the university did not do a thorough job and was not transparen­t in its findings.

In the meantime, it should be said that even if Mr. Jordan knew about the abuse, it has no bearing on the FBI investigat­ion.

Finally, Mr. Jordan might do himself and the alleged victims a great deal of good by meeting with them. He should take a page from the book of Pope Francis, who has educated himself about clergy sex abuse by actually spending time with the victims and hearing their stories. The victims in this case were people Mr. Jordan knew well and was responsibl­e for mentoring.

We all should assume that Jim Jordan is a man of goodwill, but also that the alleged victims of abuse by OSU’s wrestling team doctor are men of goodwill and that they have little to gain by telling what they remember to be true.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States