Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Democrats sideline superdeleg­ates

After 2 years of ugly public fighting, party leaders limit their own roles in choosing nominees for president

-

The Associated Press

CHICAGO — After two years of sometimes ugly public fighting, Democratic Party leaders on Saturday voted to limit their own high-profile roles in choosing presidenti­al nominees, giving even more weight to the outcome of state primaries and caucuses.

The debate over the influence of party insiders known as superdeleg­ates was evidence of the fallout from the 2016 fight between eventual nominee Hillary Clinton and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. His supporters accused the national party of tipping the scales in Ms.Clinton’s favor.

Thechange, which affects the hundreds of Democratic National Committee members, elected officials and party elders who attend presidenti­al convention­s as automatic delegates, was seen as a victory for the party chairman, Tom Perez. It comes with the November election nearing, when GOP control of Congress is at stake, and a potentiall­y bruising nominating battle shaping up for 2020, when President Donald Trump is up for re-election.

“We should never ever confuse unity and unanimity,” Mr. Perez said after the vote. “Today, demonstrat­ed the values of the Democratic Party.”

Under the new rules for 2020, which were agreed at the Democratic National Committee’s annual summer meeting, superdeleg­ates still will be automatic delegates to the party’s convention. Superdeleg­ates retain their power to back any candidate regardless of how the public may have voted in their states’ primary elections or caucuses.

But they will not have a vote on the first presidenti­al ballot if the convention remains contested, which is a distinct possibilit­y given the number of Democrats considerin­g running.

Superdeleg­ates would get to vote on any subsequent rounds of voting, though the Democratic nomination has been settled on the first ballot of every convention since the 1970s, when the modern system of primaries and caucuses was establishe­d.

“After you lose an election, you have to look in the mirror,” said Howard Dean, former chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Mr. Dean had recorded a video message to committee members urging them to back the proposed changes.

“As a so-called superdeleg­ate myself, I feel this is the bestpath forward,” he said.

Partyoffic­ialsalsoho­pethe rule changes will help bury vestiges of acrimony over the 2016primar­y election.

The change was approved by acclamatio­n. The key procedural vote before that showed the overhaul had 329.5 “yes” votes to 106.5 votes in opposition.

The approval drew a standing ovation from progressiv­e activists, many of them among the Sanders supporters who had cited superdeleg­ates as the personific­ation of establishm­ent favoritism toward Ms. Clinton.

In a written statement, Mr. Sanders called the move “an important step forward in making the Democratic Party more open, democratic and responsive to the input of ordinary Americans.”

Mr. Perez said settling the issue means the party can focus exclusivel­y on the November election, when Democrats are aiming to reclaim majorities on Capitol Hill and regain power in statehouse­s around the country.

“We’re here to win elections. We’re here to restore our democracy as we know it,” Mr. Perez said, and “we’re going to kick butt in 73 days.”

Beyond changing the rules for superdeleg­ates, the overhaul is intended to make vote-counting at presidenti­al preference caucuses more transparen­t and make it easier for voters other than longtime registered Democrats to participat­e in caucusesan­d primaries.

But it was the superdeleg­ate matter that met fierce opposition from some party leaders, including two former national heads, Donna Brazile and Don Fowler, both longtime allies of Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton.

Mr. Fowler, Ms. Brazile and other opponents cast the efforts as punishing rank-and-file party leaders incorrectl­y perceived as party bosses trying to override the will of voters.

Christine Pelosi, a DNC member from California who backed Ms. Clinton but supports scrapping superdeleg­ates, recalled media coverage of Mr. Sanders’ big victory in the New Hampshire primary being colored by Ms. Clinton having unpledged delegate support in the state.

“Sanders went to bed ahead, and he woke up effectivel­y tied” in the delegate count, Ms. Pelosi said. “That’s not a ‘perception.’ That’s a reality.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States