Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Casey, Barletta debate health care, Mueller and TV ad

- By Marc Levy

Associated Press

PHILADELPH­IA — The first debate between Pennsylvan­ia’s Democratic U.S. Sen. Bob Casey and his Republican challenger, U.S. Rep. Lou Barletta, touched on health care, abortion rights and the economy under President Donald Trump before it ended in a personal and emotional exchange Saturday.

The hour-long debate, at WPVITV in Philadelph­ia, also featured Mr. Barletta being prompted four times to directly answer whether he would vote to prevent Mr. Trump from firing special counsel Robert Mueller, whose investigat­ion uncovered Russian interferen­ce in the 2016 election.

Mr. Barletta has badly lagged Mr. Casey in fundraisin­g and independen­t polls, making it a low-profile race in a state Mr. Trump won in 2016.

Mr. Casey is seeking a third sixyear term in the Nov. 6 election.

In his closing statement, Mr. Barletta raised the matter of a Casey TV ad that he objected to last weekend when it began running. Mr. Barletta contends it is particular­ly cruel to his family because it mirrors the plight of his toddler grandson, a twin, who is fighting cancer.

The TV ad accuses Mr. Barletta of voting to let insurers strip coverage for pre-existing conditions and features a woman, Stacie Ritter, whose twin daughters were diagnosed with cancer.

Mr. Barletta challenged Mr. Casey again to take the TV ad down.

“Could you tell me why you did that?” Mr. Barletta asked, looking at Mr. Casey and his voice shaking. “And why you won’t take the ad down?”

Mr. Casey, hand over his heart looking back at Mr. Barletta, said he was sorry if the ad had caused Mr. Barletta and his family any pain, and that he had not intended that. Any similarity, he said, was unintentio­nal.

“The reason I didn’t make the connection between that ad and your grandson was very simple: I was thinking about Stacie Ritter and her story and her daughters’ story about pre-existing conditions,” Mr. Casey said.

Mr. Barletta, speaking to reporters later, questioned how sorry Mr. Casey is if he hasn’t taken the ad down.

The issue of pre-existing conditions is being litigated by Democrats in campaigns across the country since the Trump administra­tion supported a lawsuit in federal court seeking to strike down the 2010 health care law known as “Obamacare,” including its protection­s against insurers charging more for people with pre-existing conditions.

Mr. Casey’s campaign removed the ad from the Scranton TV market, Mr. Barletta’s home market. It remains running elsewhere, and Mr. Casey’s campaign has said Mr. Barletta “will be held accountabl­e” for his votes.

Mr. Barletta has acknowledg­ed voting numerous times in Congress to repeal “Obamacare.” But, he insisted during the debate, he would not support legislatio­n that “does not take care of people with pre-existing conditions.”

Mr. Barletta and Mr. Casey are on opposite sides of Mr. Trump. Mr. Barletta is one of his biggest allies on Capitol Hill, and is endorsed by the president. Mr. Casey is a staunch critic.

On the question of Mr. Mueller, Mr. Barletta said there’s no proof that Mr. Trump’s campaign colluded with the Russians. At one point, he said, “Yeah, I would protect,” and then started a new sentence.

“I want to see this come to an end, let me just say that,” Mr. Barletta said. “I would like Mueller to be there when it comes to an end, but if he’s going to go on for another five years, I don’t think we should keep going until we find something if there’s nothing there.”

“It doesn’t sound like a ringing endorsemen­t of Robert Mueller,” Mr. Casey said, before accusing Mr. Barletta of equivocati­ng on the rule of law.

Asked a fourth time, Mr. Barletta said no.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States