Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Let the people vote

America finally has a pro-democracy movement — and it did very well at the polls last week

- David Leonhardt is a columnist for The New York Times.

The United States finally has the pro-democracy movement that it needs. Last week, ballot initiative­s to improve the functionin­g of democracy fared very well. In Florida — a state divided nearly equally between right and left — more than 64 percent of voters approved restoring the franchise to 1.5 million people with felony conviction­s. In Colorado, Michigan and Missouri, measures to reduce gerrymande­ring passed. In Maryland, Michigan and Nevada, measures to simplify voter registrati­on passed. “In red states as well as blue states,” Chiraag Bains of the think tank Demos says, “voters overwhelmi­ngly sent the message: We’re taking our democracy back.”

Of course, there is still an enormous amount of work to do. Voting remains more difficult here than in almost any other affluent country. On Election Day, I had to wait in line for 45 minutes, even though I have a job that gives me the luxury of voting in the middle of the day.

And this country also suffers, unfortunat­ely, from an anti-democracy movement: Leaders of the Republican Party — out of a fear of the popular will — keep trying to make voting harder. They have closed polling places, reduced voting hours and introduced bureaucrat­ic hurdles.

Amid last week’s mostly good news, Arkansas and North Carolina passed new voter-identifica­tion measures that are clearly intended to hold down AfricanAme­rican turnout. Most outrageous­ly, top Republican­s, including President Donald Trump and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, are arguing that Florida should not carefully count all of the votes from this year’s election.

Over all, though, the election was an excellent one for American democracy. The battle has now been fully joined: Progressiv­e activists have come to understand the importance of promoting and protecting democracy. Most citizens — across the political left, center and right — agree.

Before the midterms, the leaders of Indivisibl­e, the big progressiv­e grass-roots group, conducted a national survey of its members — people who had marched, knocked on doors or otherwise gotten politicall­y involved over the past two years. The survey included a list of issues and asked which should be the Democrats’ top priorities after the midterms. It included health care, gun safety, the environmen­t, civil rights, reproducti­ve rights, taxes, the courts, education and criminal justice reform. And there was a landslide winner. But it wasn’t any of those issues, important as they are.

The winning issue was democracy.

Some 69 percent of respondent­s named it in their top three priorities. Health care finished a distant second, at 48 percent. Then came the environmen­t (43 percent), judicial nomination­s (32 percent) and civil rights (29 percent).

“It comes from this general concern about democratic institutio­ns not being reflective of the will of the people,” Ezra Levin, a co-founder of Indivisibl­e, told me. Leah Greenberg, also a cofounder, says, “We have to unrig the rules.” Best of all, the success of the recent ballot initiative­s shows that these attitudes exist among many centrists and conservati­ves, too.

True, some pro-democracy changes are not realistic any time soon. Mr. Trump and a GOP Senate won’t enact a new federal Voting Rights Act, nor will they grant the full rights of citizenshi­p to the residents of Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. But many other changes are feasible.

At the state level, a wave of new governors and legislator­s will soon take office, who could accomplish a lot. States that don’t have automatic voter registrati­on should adopt it. States that have not yet created nonpartisa­n offices to draw congressio­nal districts should follow the examples of Colorado, Michigan and Missouri.

If governors and legislator­s won’t act, citizen activists should, using ballot initiative­s. Most of these measures will pass, in both blue states and red. Arizona, Florida and Ohio, among others, could hold initiative­s to establish automatic registrati­on, Stephen Wolf of Daily Kos has noted. Still other states could follow Florida’s lead and re-enfranchis­e people with felony conviction­s.

This is also a moment to think ambitiousl­y about a pro-democracy agenda. Any Democrat considerin­g a 2020 run for president should be working on a democracy plan, much as any Democrat running in 2008 had a health care plan.

My own wish list includes universal voting by mail, which some parts of the West already use — and which lifts turnout much more than automatic voter registrati­on alone. I would also like to see more places lower the voting age to 16 for local elections, as a few Maryland cities have. If you’re old enough to operate a lethal two-ton vehicle, you’re old enough to have a say in your community’s future.

More democratic participat­ion won’t solve all of the country’s problems. But it will solve some of them. The United States has low voter turnout for a reason: Our system — with workday elections, long voting lines and cumbersome registrati­on rules — is designed to discourage mass participat­ion. That same system once barred women, AfricanAme­ricans and 18-year-olds, among others, from voting.

The system has changed before, and it can change again. It is already starting to.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States