Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Killing innocents

Late-term abortion is horrifying and beyond the pale

- Cal Thomas Cal Thomas is a syndicated columnist for Tribune Content Agency.

The uproar over New York state’s Reproducti­ve Health Act, which allows late-term abortions performed by “health care practition­ers” when the “patient is within 24 weeks from the commenceme­nt of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health” should come as no surprise.

These and similar efforts in other states are the rotten fruit of a culture that has long abandoned the sanctity of life. Listen to the rhetoric for proof. Women make abortion decisions, no one else. Men lost their right long ago to have a say in the matter. The familiar clichés about “a woman’s right to choose” and “a woman’s body” are repeated as if that settles everything — even in cases of abortion after birth, which a 2012 article by bioethicis­ts Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, cited in The Washington Post, claims is not out of bounds.

After-birth abortion, they maintain, “... could be ethically permissibl­e in all the circumstan­ces where abortion would be . ... We propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion,’ rather than ‘infanticid­e,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus (on which ‘abortions’ in the traditiona­l sense are performed) rather than to that of a child.”

Then there’s Norwegian bioethicis­t Joona Rasanen, who argues that a case could be made for giving “... the genetic parents a right to kill (or leave to die) their newborn infant, even if the infant has a right to life ... people have a right to their genetic privacy and having the newborn infant in the world that carries the genetic material of the genetic parents violates their right to genetic privacy.”

Sound extreme? Abortion on demand once sounded extreme, too.

What has been legislated in New York, been attempted in Virginia and may be coming soon to a state near you, can be considered nothing less than an updated form of child sacrifice. Some ancient cultures offered their children on altars of fire or killed them and presented them to gods in hopes of receiving some twisted blessing. Instead, their uncivilize­d civilizati­ons collapsed from moral rot.

Child sacrifice was specifical­ly condemned in the Bible. In Leviticus 18:21, 20:3 and Deuteronom­y 12:30-31 and 18:10, there are condemnati­ons and laws against child sacrifice, along with human sacrifice in general. Human sacrifices are seen as the barbaric customs of idol worshipper­s. “They worshiped their idols, which became a snare to them. They sacrificed their sons and daughters to false gods. They shed innocent blood, the blood of their sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan, and the land was desecrated by their blood.” (Psalm 106:36-38, NIV).

Modern idols — personal peace, convenienc­e, pleasure — are more sophistica­ted. Our sacrifices today are justified on the basis of who is inconvenie­nt, imperfect or even the wrong sex. Did we think we could get away with this and not suffer national, cultural and spiritual consequenc­es?

Many countries disallow abortions after 20 weeks. China allows nearly universal access to contracept­ion and abortion, except in matters of sex selection, though how that is policed is almost impossible to comprehend. How many pregnancie­s were terminated in service to China’s former one-child policy? Are we headed in that direction? Is it too horrible to contemplat­e? Not really. It’s only a matter of time and conditioni­ng.

We keep sliding down the slippery slope and now find ourselves wallowing in an ocean of blood. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood and a eugenicist, would be happy.

“These two words [birth control],” she wrote, “sum up our whole philosophy . ... It means the release and cultivatio­n of the better elements in our society, and the gradual suppressio­n, eliminatio­n and eventual extinction, of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilizati­on.”

When the story of America is written in the past tense, its collapse will have been caused by our indifferen­ce to God, and to all of the horrors that historical­ly and inevitably follow it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States