Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Top court won’t hear truckers’ lawsuit challengin­g tolls

- By Ed Blazina Ed Blazina: eblazina@post-gazette.com, 412-263-1470 or on Twitter @EdBlazina.

The lawsuit by interstate truckers seeking billions of dollars in reimbursem­ents from the Pennsylvan­ia Turnpike for what they claimed were illegal toll charges is over.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear the appeal by the Owner Operator Independen­t Drivers Associatio­n Inc. that the agency shouldn’t be allowed to collect tolls for non -turnpike costs. The associatio­n claimed the turnpike overcharge­d for tolls because it has to give $450 million a year to the state Department of Transporta­tion to help pay for transit services, which the truckers said should be illegal.

But the U.S. Supreme Court decided it would not hear arguments after the truckers lost at the U.S. District Court and the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. The case delayed millions of dollars worth of constructi­on projects for Port Authority of Allegheny and other transit agencies for more than a year because the turnpike was unable to borrow money to pay PennDOT.

Those payments resumed last year after the district court ruled against the lawsuit.

“We are pleased with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision,” turnpike spokesman Carl DeFebo said in a prepared statement.

“However, the truckers’ lawsuit did propel the burdensome funding obligation the PA Turnpike is currently under, as well as its impact on our customers, into the limelight. It is of paramount importance to keep leaders focused on the future funding of all transporta­tion needs in the commonweal­th.”

The turnpike has been lobbying state officials to eliminate the payments to PennDOT because of its own financial problems. The payments are scheduled to be reduced to $50 million a year in 2023 and the state Legislatur­e is looking for other sources of funding.

Port Authority spokesman Adam Brandolph echoed the need for dedicated transit funding.

“We’re glad the Supreme Court denied the appeal, but the question about sustainabl­e, reliable funding for public transit is still a great priority for us,” he said.

The suit claimed using tolls for non-turnpike items should be illegal under the federal dormant commerce clause and that higher-thannecess­ary tolls illegally restricted travel.

Last year, District Court and the 3rd Circuit disagreed, saying Congress never prohibited the use of tolls for other purposes and travel motorists could travel other routes to avoid tolls.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States