Beaver Valley nuclear plant will remain open past 2021, owner says
The Beaver Valley nuclear power plant in Shippingport was scheduled to shut down next year. But Energy Harbor Corp., the new name for the formerly bankrupt FirstEnergy Solutions, announced Friday that it will keep the plant open after all.
The power station employs 1,000 people and has a total capacity of 1,872 megawatts, enough to power more than 1 million homes.
FirstEnergy Solutions notified regulators in March 2018 that it planned to close the plant claiming it was not economic to operate without some kind of subsidies for carbon-free electricity. The company pushed for legislative help in Pennsylvania and Ohio, where it operates two nuclear plants. The effort didn’t progress in Pennsylvania, but Ohio last year passed legislation that FirstEnergy credited with keeping its power plants viable.
What changed in Pennsylvania, according to Energy Harbor President and CEO John Judge, is Gov. Tom Wolf’s decision to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a program for capping and gradually decreasing carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector in 10 Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states.
It requires coal, gas and oil-fired power plants in the participating states to pay a fee for their carbon emissions. Much of the resulting revenue is spent on efforts to improve air quality and cut greenhouse gas emissions further.
Joining RGGI, Mr. Judge said in a statement, “will begin to help level the playing field for our carbon-free nuclear generators.”
Mr. Wolf announced his intention to add Pennsylvania to the 10state program in October. The Department of Environmental Protection is writing rules to guide Pennsylvania’s participation, with a full first draft expected in midApril. The goal is to join the program in 2022.
Energy Harbor warned that if the state doesn’t stick to that timeline, the company “would need to revisit deactivation.”
Nuclear operators have said the plan is critical to preserving Pennsylvania’s remaining nuclear
plants, which do not emit carbon dioxide when they create electricity but face punishing competition from power plants running on low-cost natural gas. Because fossil fuel plants would need to purchase carbon emissions credits and nuclear plants wouldn’t, the nuclear plants would become more cost-competitive in the market.
Modeling in October by economic research nonprofit Resources for the Future found that a carbon price of around $3 to $5 per ton would be enough to keep open Pennsylvania nuclear plants that would otherwise close by 2026. In the greenhouse gas initiative’s most recent quarterly auction, carbon allowances were sold at $5.65.
The Republican-led Legislature has so far balked at the plan, fearing its impact on the state’s substantial natural gas and coal industries.
State Sen. Gene Yaw, RLycoming, who heads his chamber’s environment committee, said in February that if the governor is not prevented from joining the initiative by the General Assembly or the courts, it “will lead to a discriminatory and job-killing tax on all coal and gas fired electric generation plants in the Commonwealth.”
The Wolf administration called Energy Harbor’s decision “very encouraging.”
“Reducing emissions and maintaining existing clean energy resources are primary components in the fight to address climate change, and energy companies like Energy Harbor recognize this,” Mr. Wolf’s spokeswoman, Elizabeth Rementer, said.
“That Energy Harbor is reversing course specifically because of our efforts to participate in RGGI is a concrete example of the importance of this policy, and one that Pennsylvania is extremely pleased to hear.”