Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Bohemian + leftist + Catholic = Dorothy Day, American dissident

- By Byron Borger “DOROTHY DAY: DISSENTING VOICE OF THE AMERICAN CENTURY” By John Loughery and Blythe Randolph Simon & Schuster ($30) Byron Borger runs Hearts & Minds, an independen­t bookstore in Dallastown, Pa., and the online review blog “BookNotes.”

The radical activist turned Catholic agitator, Dorothy Day, visited Pittsburgh often from her impoverish­ed Manhattan neighborho­od where she served the poor and destitute. Once she spoke at a gathering at the activist-oriented Thomas Merton Center, then located on the city’s South Side. Few people in the room had been arrested for civil disobedien­ce as often as Dorothy Day, although she would grow to admire several legendary Pittsburgh­ers who took their faith from the pews to the streets, protesting the nuclear weapons business of Rockwell Internatio­nal and starting missions of mercy like Jubilee Soup Kitchen and the Duncan + Porter House of Hospitalit­y, which was inspired by her own Catholic Worker houses.

Even the secular unionists and socialist comrades were in awe of a woman who seemed to be a blend of the charitable Mother Teresa and the liberation theologian Oscar Romero, perhaps one of the most potent social critics of the 20thcentur­y. It was a significan­t evening; even the Center’s namesake, the monk Thomas Merton, hadn’t met the woman who published his undergroun­d essays, penned under a pseudonym.

The event is not mentioned in the exceptiona­lly detailed new biography “Dorothy Day: Dissenting Voice of the American Century” by John Loughery and Blythe Randolph, although Pittsburgh shows up several times in the hefty volume. After her 1927 conversion to Roman Catholicis­m, Dorothy Day often took retreats with a Father Hugo in Oakmont and in the 1930s she was enthralled with progressiv­e labor activism, visiting steelworke­rs and coal miners here.

Mr. Loughery and Ms.Randolph have both earned acclaim for their skillful work as biographer­s. “Dorothy Day: Dissenting Voice” is magisteria­l and glorious; it captures intimate details and offers new insights into Day’s colorful life even as it places her in the broader context of radical movements and the landscape of causes during the 20th century. It understand­s her “long loneliness” set alongside the sorts of injustices documented in Howard Zinn’s “A People’s History of the United States.”

There have been many smaller biographie­s and books about Dorothy Day and her Catholic Worker movement. It has been decades since a major work has been produced on her, and it may be that Mr. Loughery and Ms. Randolph have given us the definitive biography. Dorothy Day’s quite readable prose and deep understand­ing of social history also captures her fascinatin­g, enigmatic — some might say aggravatin­g — devotion to Jesus Christ and the Catholic church even as she railed against injustice, war, church duplicity and compromise. As the biographer­s put it: “An impassione­d critic of unfettered capitalism, U.S. foreign policy, the nuclear arms race and the debacle of the Vietnam War, Day was at the same time as skeptical of many of the tenets of modern liberalism as she was of political conservati­sm. She was outspoken as well about what she saw as the complacent, conflicted role of religion in our national life.”

Before her Christian conversion, Dorothy Day lived a life of left-wing activism — knowing Wobblies and Communists and anarchists and pacifists — rooted in her excitable, bohemian lifestyle. She met and befriended many of the leading literary lights of those days (Edna Saint Vincent Millay, Eugene O’Neill, Hart Crane, Mary Gordon.) Mr. Loughery and Ms. Randolph know well the arts and literary scenes of the first quarter of the century and tell us the significan­ce of the plays she attended, the novels she read, the writers she worked with (or slept with) in Chicago, New Orleans or New York.

That she was writing for banned socialist magazines, crossing paths with John Reed (think of the movie “Reds”) and getting arrested with suffragett­es even while debating Dostoevsky and e.e. cummings with artists and playwright­s, makes her story fabulously entertaini­ng. The authors are excellent guides to the politics and cultural reformers who so influenced the era and the 20-something Day. The biography becomes, in the words of Barbara Ehrenreich, “a surprising­ly intimate history of twentiethc­entury America.”

There is a moving chapter explaining Dorothy Day’s decision to baptize her daughter (born out of wedlock) and her own compelling conversion to Catholicis­m. As always, Mr. Loughery and Ms. Randolph report what Day was reading (in literature, theology, philosophy and politics; it becomes evident that one simply cannot understand Dorothy Day without diving deep into her own reading and intellectu­al questions). The final three-quarters of this 400-plus page book explore the founding of the Catholic Worker newspaper (at its zenith with a subscripti­on of more than 100,000), the houses open to the poor and mentally ill, the farms, the communes, the fights, the prayers and the protests.

The chapter on Dorothy’s 1980 death and funeral begins with these lines: “Dorothy Day’s passage from this world was in the spirit of the Catholic Worker itself: intense, chaotic, spare, sad, passionate, celebrator­y, anti-intuitiona­l, and personalis­t to the last.” Mourners poured in, more than 800 “who represente­d the disparate strands of Dorothy’s life.” These included Cesar Chavez, I.F. Stone, Abbie Hoffman, Robert Ellsberg, Frank Sheed, Daniel Berrigan and Newsweek’s Kenneth Woodward. The biographer­s know, though, that Dorothy Day’s service to the hungry received no reprieve, and neither could her followers. They continue.

After the funeral, mourners went back to Maryhouse, where a 10-gallon kettle of pea soup was simmering and loaves of brown bread and baskets of oranges were filling a table nearby. There were so many to feed that day.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States