Lawmakers will rule again over state’s political redistricting, but critics not giving up
HARRISBURG — For a moment, anti-gerrymandering advocates in Pennsylvania had a victory in sight.
Fed up with political districts that experts said were drawn to benefit one party over another, grass-roots groups launched a campaign to take lawmakers out of the process and create a commission of everyday voters to do the work instead.
They held rallies, demanded public hearings, and even showed up on the doorstep of one top lawmaker’s home, all with the goal of getting a constitutional amendment to voters before maps are drawn again in 2021.
The stakes are significant: Independent research shows gerrymandering protects incumbents and strips communities of political power by heavily concentrating one party’s voters into a single district or spreading them out unnaturally.
But with the General Assembly on summer break, time has officially run out, said Fair Districts PA cofounder Carol Kuniholm: “The bills that were constitutional amendments are dead.”
Advocates are now turning their attention to Plan B, a bill that would keep lawmakers at the helm of the process but check them through new transparency requirements. It also would institute new rules that would prohibit the most egregious practices, like disregarding county and city boundaries to pack voters into a single district.
That was one of the problems the Pennsylvania Supreme Court identified in 2018, when it overturned and later redrew the state’s congressional map.
“It was a map that was drawn entirely behind closed doors,” said Benjamin Geffen, an attorney at the Public Interest Law
Center, which led the lawsuit on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania and individual state residents. “It was voted on the very same day they released the map. … Then it passed in the Senate two weeks later.”
Every 10 years, lawmakers use new census information to draw a congressional map that must garner the approval of the governor.
The state House and Senate maps, however, are a different story. They are drawn by a five-member commission made up of Democratic and Republican leaders from the legislature as well as a chair picked by those lawmakers or, if they can’t agree, the state Supreme Court. That process is enshrined in the state Constitution, making it a lot tougher to change than a simple law.
Critics of Pennsylvania’s redistricting system have long focused on who draws the maps as the most important area in need of reform. But experts from the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School have argued that just as important are the rules for how it’s done.
A bill introduced in June by Rep. Wendi Thomas, RBucks, targets those rules, and has the backing of goodgovernment advocates including the Committee of Seventy and Fair Districts PA.
When lawmakers draw both the legislative and congressional maps, they must ensure districts have equal population. Ms. Thomas’ measure would put in place even more criteria, including a cap on how many times legislators can split a county. Mr. Geffen said this would provide a “check on doing the most outrageous of gerrymanders.”
The measure would also codify into law yearslong efforts by grass-roots groups like Fair Districts PA to make the redistricting process more transparent. Videos of meetings and the underlying data used to create or evaluate maps would be made available on a website, and public hearings would be held several times before and after lawmakers finalize the plans.
“I really believe that at all times, that it’s humanly possible, the government needs to be completely transparent,” Ms. Thomas said. “Transparency for me is critically important.”
If the legislature acts before the end of January, and Gov. Tom Wolf signs off, the new rules would be in place when lawmakers begin drawing the legislative and congressional maps next year. Mr. Geffen said the bill would not be “the gold standard,” as it wouldn’t “empower an independent commission to draw maps in a fully public process.”
“But recognizing that we don’t have time before the next redistricting cycle to get a constitutional amendment, a bill like this would certainly be an improvement over the status quo,” he said.
Whether the House and Senate will agree to rules that limit their ability to draw districts — and pick voters — remains to be seen, though in the past they’ve been slow to pass legislation that reduces their influence or power. When lawmakers return in the fall, they’ll also have to grapple with the ever-present threat of the coronavirus and an incomplete state budget.
Ms. Thomas’ bill was recently sent to the House State Government Committee, chaired by Rep. Garth Everett, R-Lycoming, who did not respond to request for comment.
Sen. John Disanto, R-Dauphin, who chairs the State
Government Committee in the upper chamber, said his panel has been focused on COVID-19 legislation and “immediate election code changes for this year’s primary and general elections.”
Good-government advocates are also still pushing for a vote on a bill from Rep. Jim Gregory, R-Blair, that would create an independent commission to draw the congressional map — a measure that doesn’t require a constitutional amendment and could, in theory, be in place by 2021.
Power shift
Even if lawmakers fail to embrace any reforms, the 2021 redistricting process will look different than it did in 2011, as power in two key posts has shifted to Democrats.
Mr. Wolf, a Democrat, will have to sign off on the congressional map put forth by
GOP leaders in the legislature. And the state Supreme Court, now controlled by Democrats, will likely get to appoint a fifth member to the panel that draws the House and Senate maps.
But ideally, good-government advocates said, people in power from either party should not decide how the maps are drawn.
“It should not be about helping one party or incumbents for one party … making a mutual, back-scratching agreement,” Mr. Geffen said. “What they should be doing is drawing a map designed to make it possible for voters to have ... competitive races all across the commonwealth.”