Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Retain judicial elections

-

Gerrymande­ring is the system where politician­s pick their constituen­ts instead of the other way around. Used widely over the years by both political parties when they are in power, gerrymande­ring has been criticized by many for subverting democracy. Instead of drawing fair districts, the districts are drawn to suit the re-election needs of politician­s.

And now instead of being confined to the drawing of districts for the state Legislatur­e and U.S. Congress, Pennsylvan­ia’s Republican lawmakers want to see the practice extended to the state’s judiciary.

The state Senate recently voted 2624 for a constituti­onal amendment to have statewide justices such as those on the Supreme Court, Superior Court and Commonweal­th Court run in geographic­al districts where candidates must live for at least one year.

Currently, the justices run in statewide elections. The proposal divides the state into 31 judicial districts: seven Supreme Court districts, nine Commonweal­th Court districts, and 15 Superior Court districts.

The state House of Representa­tives had already approved the move. For the amendment to become law, both chambers must approve it again next year. Then, it must be approved by voters in a referendum, which could come as early as next spring.

The bills were opposed by every Democrat in both chambers, as well as a few Republican­s.

Some proponents of the bill claim that it would help rural parts of the state that aren’t represente­d on judicial issues because most of the appellate court judges come from Allegheny and Philadelph­ia counties.

However, that begs the question of how the Pennsylvan­ia Constituti­on can be interprete­d in such a way. Aren’t all Pennsylvan­ia residents subject to the same laws? There is no distinctio­n between urban and rural areas in any of the state’s statutes.

What’s really behind the bill is a desire to get more Republican­s on the bench. Currently, there are five Democrats and two Republican­s on the state Supreme Court.

The drive to create judicial districts, along with calls from Republican­s to impeach Democrats on Pennsylvan­ia’s high court, arose in 2018 after the court struck down Republican-drawn congressio­nal districts as unconstitu­tionally gerrymande­red.

Republican­s have been further angered by recent court rulings that stymied their attempts to rein in Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf’s responses to the coronaviru­s pandemic.

It’s noteworthy that Republican­s made no such calls for regional courts when they made up the majority on the state Supreme Court from 2002 until 2015.

Changing the state constituti­on at the whim of the party in power is bad government in every way.

This bill can’t be allowed to become law. If legislator­s won’t vote it down, then voters across Pennsylvan­ia must stand up and reject this bill.

 ?? Stephanie Strasburg/Post-Gazette ?? The Pennsylvan­ia Capitol in Harrisburg.
Stephanie Strasburg/Post-Gazette The Pennsylvan­ia Capitol in Harrisburg.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States