Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

WE NEED TO HAVE FAITH IN OUR COUNTRY, WRITES KEITH C. BURRIS

- Keith Burris is executive editor of the Post-Gazette, and vice president and editorial director of Block Newspapers(kburris@postgazett­e.com).

Four years ago I heard something I had never heard before, in 50 years of observing American politics and 40 of covering and commenting on it: “Existentia­l threat.”

People told me, on a regular basis, that they could not vote for Donald Trump because he represente­d an existentia­l threat.

Many people are saying it this year too, of course, and adding that the threat is now proven.

But I had never heard this term applied to a presidenti­al candidate before.

I’d heard Richard Nixon called dishonest and even evil.

I’d heard that Ronald Reagan was an “amiable dunce” who could not fully occupy the presidency.

I heard that George W. Bush was simply a dunce (maybe not even amiable) who would be run by others and not know it.

I even heard that Jerry Ford could not be elected to his own term as president in 1976 because his running mate — a young Bob Dole who would one day be seen as moderate if not beloved — was unfit to be “a heartbeat away.”

But no one said anyone was “an existentia­l threat,” which literally means a threat to existence — life itself.

The other day I heard it said about Joe Biden.

“Sleepy Joe,” I now hear, and am now reading, is an existentia­l threat who will bring us socialism, an enhanced nanny state and a collapsed stock market.

Imagine the damage he could do if fully awake.

Four years ago, Paul Krugman, and other eminences, warned that the election of Mr. Trump would collapse the markets. Just the election. Walls would fall before he took a single action or initiated a single policy.

I think what is new is the hysterical but honest conviction that, if the other party, the candidate I do not prefer, or the guy who thinks otherwise prevails (if only temporaril­y, which is the only way anyone does prevail in a democracy), the sky will certainly fall — the republic will well and truly collapse.

How do you walk a conviction like that back?

You don’t. You say: This is a president, or an election, that I refuse to recognize as legitimate.

Maybe you also say: That guy and his party will destroy us. No doubt about it. And that makes them evil — in effect if not in intent.

The late James Rhodes, four times elected governor of Ohio, had three rules for politician­s: Do not steal from the public, not even a nickel or a fountain pen; treat those who work for you well; and never hate someone so much you cannot make a deal with them tomorrow.

No. 3 is most important. And No. 3 has few followers today.

Joe Biden was right to work with segregatio­nists in the Senate. Politics is often the art of working with people whose character or ideas you loathe — in order to modestly progress.

Let’s say that the election of Mr. Trump would result in a further descent into incivility and in further encroachme­nts upon power granted to other branches of government or to the states. Those would be two very serious matters, wouldn’t they?

But would they mean the end of the republic?

Let’s say that the election of Mr. Biden would mean the triumph of wokeness and the empowermen­t of thought police everywhere. Let’s say we would all pay many more taxes and at the end of four years be less free.

These developmen­ts, also, would be very serious indeed. But would the country as we know it have ceased to exist?

Politics is about proximate solutions, not ultimate ones. But we have begun to invest our politics with ultimate meaning and ultimate stakes and outcomes — a huge and dangerous mistake.

We are missing a sense of proportion and patience.

The profession­al politician­s of old knew that both victories and defeats were temporary and would be not just ultimately but soon forgotten.

But we are missing something else too — a sense of faith. We are lacking in the sense that the country is bigger and more enduring than its current politics and bigger than any one moment, woman or man, however good or bad.

We live and fight and think and err today; the country goes on. That is an existentia­l condition. By the country, I mean four things: the constituti­onal system; the ideas that have built and sustained it; the great heroes of our history, from Madison to Lincoln to FDR to Martin Luther King; and the people of the country. The people. Maybe the first three things are the most important part of our American faith. But we also have to have faith in each other. We have to have faith in the basic sense, decency and patriotism of our neighbors — as neighbors and not opponents or enemies. Years ago, on an interview program, the actor Hal Holbrook was asked why a show he acted in — “Evening Shade,” about a small town in Arkansas — was popular. He said it was because the writer of the show knew the people she was writing about and actually liked them. I sometimes think our political problems boil down to this: We don’t know or like each other much any more. In any case, the nation will survive this election and its winner and, maybe in adjusting and accepting it, even recover a few principles that endure. It is said that the sad fate of the atheist is that when he feels grateful he has no one to thank. The sad fate of a person who feels no love of country is that he has no fellow citizens to debate. He must put ultimate store in his own small prejudices and private dreams.

 ?? Maura Losch/Post-Gazette ??
Maura Losch/Post-Gazette

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States