Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Uber, Lyft win ruling in California

-

BERKELEY, Calif. — An appeals court has allowed ride-hailing giants Uber and Lyft to continue treating their drivers as independen­t contractor­s in California while an appeal works its way through the court.

Both companies had threatened to shut down if a ruling went into effect Friday morning that would have forced them to treat all their drivers as employees, a change they said would be impossible to accomplish overnight.

Lyft told riders and drivers in a Thursday blog post it planned to discontinu­e providing rides in California just before midnight tonight unless a court grants a stay in a pending case. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowsha­hi had repeatedly said its service would have no choice but to stop providing rides in California if the state’s law goes into effect because the company can’t afford to hire 50,000 drivers as employees quickly enough to comply.

The shutdown would have been a major blow to two companies that still haven’t proven they can make money, even as they have held down their expenses by treating drivers as independen­t contractor­s who don’t receive the same benefits as their full-time employees.

California represents a substantia­l chunk of both companies’ businesses. It accounted for 9% of Uber’s worldwide rides before the pandemic caused people to avoid traveling. The state is even more important to Lyft, which doesn’t operate outside of the U.S. besides Canada. California accounted for 21% of Lyft’s rides before the pandemic, but that figure dropped to 16% during the April-June period as more people stayed home with fewer places to go.

The unavailabi­lity of the two ride-hailing services also would have delivered another blow to the California economy by taking away the paychecks of Uber and Lyft drivers while also making it more difficult for people without cars to get around. That’s why the mayors of San Diego and San Jose, Calif. — two of the three largest cities in the state — joined forces this week, urging the appeals court to block the law from going into effect.

“Being forced into a situation where shutting down service is the only viable option hurts everyone at a moment when we need to pull together to help more California­ns make ends meet,” said San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer, a Republican, and San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo, a Democrat.

Both companies had sought the stay of an Aug. 10 court decision that ruled they must start treating their drivers as employees, not independen­t contractor­s, by Friday morning. Both appealed and sought a stay on the decision.

The companies are hoping to overturn the California law underlying the lower-court decision with a ballot initiative in the upcoming election. Uber and Lyft are among the biggest contributo­rs to a $110 million effort to get the initiative, Propositio­n 22, passed to rescind the law. Lyft urged for passage of the initiative in its blog post.

At issue is a decision that could reshape the so-called gig economy as drivers, delivery workers and others who work for popular apps on an as-needed basis seek improved working conditions and benefits that many in the workforce enjoy.

 ?? Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press ?? California accounted for 9% of Uber’s worldwide rides and 21% of Lyft’s rides before the pandemic.
Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press California accounted for 9% of Uber’s worldwide rides and 21% of Lyft’s rides before the pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States