Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Impeachmen­t of state justice?

-

A go-nowhere but nonetheles­s chilling effort to impeach a Pennsylvan­ia Supreme Court justice, the handiwork of a cadre of Republican state legislator­s, amounts to an attempt at judicial tampering. These rogue lawmakers should be put in their place — a place of shame — by their colleagues in the General Assembly.

Court leaders, both federal and state, as well as profession­al legal organizati­ons have roundly and rightly condemned the impeachmen­t drive against Justice David N. Wecht. The drive — House Resolution No. 1044 — was launched by Rep. Frank Ryan of Lebanon County and bolstered by nearly three dozen GOP legislator­s including Eric Nelson, Greensburg; Daryl Metcalfe, Cranberry; Donald “Bud” Cook, Washington;

Jim Marshall, Big Beaver;

Eric Davanzo, Southmorel­and; Cris Dush, Jefferson; and Ryan Warner, Lemont Furnace.

Rep. Ryan contends that four of Justice Wecht’s legal opinions amount to “misbehavio­r in office,” breaching judicial ethics and oversteppi­ng into the legislativ­e domain. The truth is just the opposite. Rep. Ryan and his cohort are failing to stay in their own lane and the breach of ethics is theirs. It is no coincidenc­e that Justice Wecht, elected to the bench in 2015, is a Democrat.

Chief Justice Thomas G. Saylor, who was elected to the court as a Republican in 1997, has declared the impeachmen­t effort an “affront to judicial independen­ce.” U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the

Middle District of Pennsylvan­ia, also slammed the legislator­s’ move, saying, “This challenge...is a direct threat to a bedrock of our constituti­onal democracy — an independen­t judiciary.” Judge Jones served in the Republican administra­tion of Gov. Tom Ridge before he was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush to the federal bench in 2002. He is the co-chairman of Pennsylvan­ia’s Judicial Independen­ce Commission.

The four decisions in question deal with redistrict­ing of the state’s congressio­nal districts, Pittsburgh’s mandate of paid sick leave, mail-in ballot drop boxes, and Gov. Tom Wolf’s COVID-19 emergency order. The details of the cases are moot. Justice Wecht did what he was elected to do and what he is paid to do: He ruled on legal cases that came before him.

The fact that these rogue Republican­s didn’t like the rulings should inspire them to do what they were elected to do and what they are paid to do: pass legislatio­n that changes the landscapes in question. If they can muster the necessary support. And that’s a big if.

What they should not do is attempt to intimidate another branch of government.

Justice Wecht issued a statement: “We are a nation of laws, not a nation of mobs. When anyone, including legislator­s, attempts to intimidate our judges, they threaten our liberties and the rule of law. It is ironic that here in Pennsylvan­ia, the cradle of our nation’s liberty, some forget our history and the tradition of judicial independen­ce that has safeguarde­d our people’s freedoms.”

Nicely put.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States