Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

U.K.’s Johnson says ‘strong possibilit­y’ Brexit talks will fail

-

BRUSSELS — With a chaotic and costly no-deal Brexit three weeks away, leaders of both the European Union and United Kingdom saw an ever likelier collapse of trade talks Thursday, and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson even spoke of a “strong possibilit­y” of failure.

Both sides told their citizens to brace for a New Year’s shock, as trade between the U.K. and the European mainland could face its biggest upheaval in almost a half century.

Mr. Johnson’s gloomy comments came as negotiator­s sought to find a belated breakthrou­gh in technical talks, where their leaders failed three times in political discussion­s over the past week.

Facing a Sunday deadline set after inconclusi­ve talks between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mr. Johnson on Wednesday night, both sides realized their drawn-out four-year divorce might well end on bad terms.

“I do think we need to be very, very clear: There is now a strong possibilit­y — a strong possibilit­y — that we will have a solution that is much more like an Australian relationsh­ip with the EU,” Mr. Johnson said, using his phrasing for a nodeal exit.

Australia does not have a free trade deal with the 27nation EU.

“That doesn’t mean it’s a bad thing,” Mr. Johnson added.

On the EU side, reactions were equally pessimisti­c.

“I am a bit more gloomy today, as far as I can hear,” Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven said at an EU summit where Ms. von der Leyen briefed the 27 leaders on her unsuccessf­ul dinner with Mr. Johnson.

“She was not really confident that all difficulti­es could be resolved,” said David Sassoli, president of the EU parliament that will have to approve any deal brokered.

A cliff- edge departure would threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and cost tens of billions of dollars in commerce.

To prepare for a sudden exit on Jan. 1, the EU on Thursday proposed four contingenc­y measures to make sure at least air and road traffic would continue as smoothly as possible between both sides for the next six months.

It also proposed fishermen should still have access to each other’s waters for up to a year, to limit the commercial damage of a no-deal split. The plans depend on the U.K. offering similar initiative­s. The move was indicative of how the EU saw a bad breakup as ever more realistic.

Mr. Johnson warned, “Yes, now is the time for the public and businesses to get ready for January 1 because, believe me, there’s going to be change either way.”

For months now, trade talks have faltered on Britain’s insistence that as a sovereign nation it must not be bound indefinite­ly to EU rules and regulation­s — even if it wants to export freely to the bloc. That same steadfastn­ess has marked the EU in preserving its cherished single market and seeking guarantees against a low- regulation neighbor that would be able to undercut its businesses.

After Mr. Johnson’s midnight return to London, reactions were equally dim there.

U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the Sunday deadline was a “moment of finality” — though he added “you can never say never entirely.”

In four years of talks on the U.K.’s departure terms and a future trade relationsh­ip, such self-imposed deadlines have been broken time and again since Britain voted to leave the EU.

Jan. 1 though is different because the U.K. has made the 11-month transition time since its Jan. 31 official departure legally binding.

“There are big ideologica­l, substantiv­e and policy gaps that need to be bridged,” said Mujtaba Rahman, Europe managing director for the Eurasia Group. “They’re so far apart, and the time is so limited now.”

 ?? Andrew Testa/The New York Times ?? A street in London is left nearly empty as the city entered the first day of lockdown restrictio­ns to help curb the spread of the coronaviru­s on Nov. 5.
Andrew Testa/The New York Times A street in London is left nearly empty as the city entered the first day of lockdown restrictio­ns to help curb the spread of the coronaviru­s on Nov. 5.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States