Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A hidden feature of Biden’s first big moves: Major outreach to Trump country

- By Greg Sargent

Republican­s are running a giant scam that’s designed to game the national debate over whether President Joe Biden is genuinely trying to “unify the country.” In this grift routine, Mr. Biden is being divisive if anyone on his staff criticizes his predecesso­r’s performanc­e, or if Mr. Biden dares to implement the agenda which earned him a popular majority.

Meanwhile, here in the world of good-faith debate, let’s suggest another standard for judging this question: Is Mr. Biden’s policy agenda shaping up as a unifying one?

In one important sense, it is. Embedded in some of Mr. Biden’s first big moves are policies that constitute major outreach to the parts of the country that elected Donald Trump president in 2016 and overwhelmi­ngly supported his reelection.

This does not mean those policies are guaranteed to succeed in delivering for those areas. But it does suggest another way to judge both the “unity” question and Mr. Biden’s policies. Producing for those areas should show that in some sense, he’s genuinely trying to overcome some of our deep divisions and is acting with an eye toward restoring national purpose.

Case in point: Mr. Biden’s new national strategy for combating COVID-19, perhaps his single most important agenda item, contains a major component for rural

major component for rural America. One of its key goals is to overcome inequities across not just racial and ethnic lines, but also across “rural/urban” lines.

To do this, the strategy envisions a stepped-up effort to get vaccines into communitie­s that are hard to reach, including rural ones. That means partnering the federal government with states and localities to pump more resources into rural health clinics. It also means mobile vaccinatio­n units that can reach rural areas.

And it entails recognizin­g the particular risks that rural Americans face from COVID-19. As Mr. Biden’s plan notes, they have a higher concentrat­ion of certain factors -- smoking, high blood pressure, obesity, lack of health insurance -- that make them more vulnerable.

Epidemiolo­gist Gregg Gonsalves says Mr. Biden’s plan is premised on a recognitio­n of deep disparitie­s in both health outcomes and public health infrastruc­ture that already exist across urban-rural lines. Mr. Gonsalves describes these disparitie­s as “pretty acute.”

“The president is building on what we know already about the rural-urban divide,” Mr. Gonsalves told me. “If you’re going to vaccinate, test and provide support for people to isolate and social distance, you’re gonna have to address these health disparitie­s.”

The pandemic “came down hard on rural communitie­s that often have very little infrastruc­ture,” Mr. Gonsalves continued. “We’re going to have to beef up that infrastruc­ture.”

Success in this endeavor, Mr. Gonsalves says, would entail getting serious resources to already existing rural health clinics, getting more medical personnel into those areas, and improving supply chains to get medical equipment (such as tests, personal protective gear and vaccines) into them, among other things.

Mr. Biden has also signed an executive order that calls for federal regulators to issue stronger workplace protection guidelines. Mr. Gonsalves says this will impact many meatpackin­g plants, where the epidemic spread among workers, and “many of them are in rural counties.”

On still another front, Mr. Biden has pledged to expand use of the Defense Production Act to corral the private sector into producing and distributi­ng medical supplies. This would entail using what’s known as industrial policy to overcome regional disparitie­s in equipment distributi­on.

That’s something the new breed of conservati­ve populists, who are trying to break from GOP plutocrati­c and anti-government ideology and come up with ways to employ government to revitalize stagnating non-metropolit­an America, generally support.

Indeed, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., endorsed this Biden promise, noting that it could help begin to reverse the “hollowing out of America’s manufactur­ing.” So if Biden can succeed at this, it would constitute a trans-ideologica­l success, and as such, should be seen as “unifying.”

“Rebuilding U.S. supply chains and supporting American manufactur­ers could become an area of common cause between farsighted Republican­s and the Biden administra­tion,” Samuel Hammond, a policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, told me, adding that this could “start healing the deeper economic divides in this country.”

Mr. Trump used the coronaviru­s to stoke civil and regional conflict. He presided over disparitie­s in distributi­on of badly needed equipment. He encouraged rebellion against blue-state governors’ public health measures. And he mused aloud about walling off parts of diseased blue America to protect virtuous red America from the pandemic.

In some ways, Mr. Biden simply cannot be “unifying” while also fulfilling his agenda. After all, his coalition supports many of the things he campaigned on, while Mr. Trump’s coalition presumably does not. So doing things like expanding legal immigratio­n and rejoining internatio­nal agreements will of necessity produce more discord and argument.

But when it comes to the pandemic, Mr. Biden is treating it as a problem afflicting all Americans -- precisely the opposite of what Mr. Trump did. If he can succeed at that, surely that should count as an actual effort to bring the country together and repair a major wound that Mr. Trump inflicted.

 ?? Evan Vucci/Associated Press ?? President Joe Biden delivers remarks on racial equity on Jan. 26 at the White House.
Evan Vucci/Associated Press President Joe Biden delivers remarks on racial equity on Jan. 26 at the White House.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States