Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Biden excels at his first news conference; the media embarrass themselves

- Jennifer Rubin Jennifer Rubin is a columnist for The Washington Post.

After weeks of whining, the White House press corps got its first official Biden presidenti­al news conference on Thursday. President Joe Biden used the event to pledge that 200 million COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns would be administer­ed by the end of his first 100 days, double his original goal. (The administra­tion will reach 100 million shots on Friday, Day 58.) He also announced that a survey showed nearly half of K-12 schools are open full-time for in-person learning. (He expressed confidence it would be more than half by the 100th day, consistent with his goal.) Certainly, that should be near the top of any news coverage.

Asked how “hard” he would work for his policy goals, he responded that “all my focus” so far has been on COVID-19 and the economic recovery, but he promised he would get to other issues such as guns, immigratio­n, climate change and voting rights. “I think my Republican colleagues are going to have to determine whether or not we’re going to work together … [or] continue the politics of division,” he said.

On immigratio­n, he made clear that crowded facilities at the southern border are not the result of a policy change from his administra­tion or the fact that migrants see him as a “nice guy.” He pointed out that there was a higher surge under his predecesso­r last spring, which certainly was not because migrants believed the former president was a “nice” guy. “It happens every single solitary year,” Mr. Biden noted. In his lengthy responses to questions on the border, he showed his skill in de-escalating issues. One message came across loud and clear: “We’re building back up the capacity that should have been maintained and built upon that [Donald] Trump dismantled. It’s going to take time.”

One reporter mentioned a 9year-old she had seen at the border and asked if Mr. Biden’s messaging was contributi­ng to the problem. No, he responded, again offering a detailed answer about the problems refugees face in their home countries that create the outflow. Prodded with a question about whether overcrowdi­ng was “acceptable,” he responded, “C’mon.” Of course it was unacceptab­le, he said, listing steps he is taking to find more beds for unaccompan­ied minors. The repeated questions on the same topic were tiresome and a poor use of precious time.

On the filibuster, he argued that “It’s being abused in a gigantic way.” He also suggested that the Senate return to the talking filibuster or reform it so it cannot be used to block legislatio­n on “elemental” issues such as voting rights.

He slammed Republican attempts to pass restrictio­ns on voting as “sick” and said they make “Jim Crow look like Jim Eagle.” He made clear that Republican voters he knows find such measures “despicable.” Is the filibuster a relic of the Jim Crow era, one reporter asked? He answered simply: “Yes.”

At another point, Mr. Biden said he “planned” to run for a second term, a somewhat meaningles­s response to a question about his intentions regarding re-election. In response to a mind-numbing question on whether he expected to run against his predecesso­r, Mr. Biden launched into an ode on helping working-class people, called out Republican­s’ hypocrisy on debt and denounced GOP tax cuts as mostly benefiting the rich. He seemed delighted to point out that Republican­s are out of sync with many of their own voters.

On foreign policy, he gave measured answers on Afghanista­n (which he intends to leave) and North Korea (for which he will pursue diplomacy with goal of denucleari­zation). On China, he made clear we need to invest in U.S. workers and science to compete, repair our alliances and speak out firmly on human rights. He spoke eloquently about the world being in a “battle between the utility of democracie­s and of autocracie­s.”

The media did not distinguis­h themselves. By asking about immigratio­n multiple times and echoing the false narrative that Mr. Biden had created a “surge,” they showed they were more interested in sound bites than actual news. Their failure to ask about the pandemic, the recession, anti-Asian violence, climate change or even infrastruc­ture (Mr. Biden had to bring it up himself) was nothing short of irresponsi­ble. They pleaded for a news conference and then showed themselves to be unserious. They never laid a glove on Mr. Biden; they did, however, make the case for why these events are an utter waste of the president’s time.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States