Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Kids continue to be poisoned by lead; it’s time to act

- Michelle Naccarati-Chapkis and Kevin Quisenberr­y Michelle Naccarati-Chapkis is executive director for Women for a Healthy Environmen­t in East Liberty, and Kevin Quisenberr­y is litigation director for Community Justice Project in Downtown Pittsburgh.

At first, Delia just thought her son, Joseph, was a little behind the curve. He wasn’t crawling or speaking at the same age as his older siblings. It wasn’t until he got to school when he was disruptive in class, unable to keep up and considered “hyperactiv­e” that she started to worry. Joseph was diagnosed with lead poisoning, based on a test that indicated an elevated blood lead level.

By then, it was too late. Lead poisoning has permanent, lasting effects — from lower IQ and behavioral issues to organ damage and speech and hearing problems — and no cure. Science has proved that there’s no safe level of exposure to lead for a child, as their growing brains and bodies absorb it readily. None.

Yet, the damage caused by this pervasive neurotoxin is completely preventabl­e. The way to stop children from being poisoned by lead is to prevent exposure to lead in the first place.

This is the premise behind a Pittsburgh lead safety law, which was drafted over the past year in collaborat­ion with experts, for use by Pittsburgh City Council as a follow-up to their

October 2020 proclamati­on that Pittsburgh would adopt an ordinance to protect citizens from the horrors of lead poisoning.

The idea is simple: Protect children in the places where they are exposed to lead. In the city of Pittsburgh, investigat­ions by the Allegheny County Health Department reveal the top causes: exposure to lead from lead-based paint and dust in homes (not surprising, as leadbased paint wasn’t banned until 1978 and 85% of Pittsburgh’s homes were built before then), followed by soil and water.

A Pittsburgh lead safety law addresses these common pathways of exposure to lead by embedding simple testing for lead in the city’s inspection­s of pre-1978 homes and child-occupied facilities; by requiring lead-safe practices as part of the permitting process for repairs, renovation­s and demolition­s where lead is disturbed and can become airborne; and by further protecting against leadin drinking water. It is such a commonsens­e approach to the legacy lead-poisoning problem in our Rust Belt city that 40 local organizati­ons representi­ng thousands of constituen­ts and nearly 300 residents have already signed on to a letter in support of it.

Why bother? Well, in the most recent four years of data, 849 children were newly diagnosed with lead poisoning in the city. That’s 849 children, disproport­ionately Black and brown Pittsburgh­ers, who are at risk of a lifetime of devastatin­g effects. And those 849 children join the thousands who are still suffering from the lingering problems associated with lead poisoning.

Still, even with science, community support and horrible health effects backing it up, our city’s elected officials remain slow to act as administra­tors balk, claiming that it’s too burdensome to include a check for lead in their existing inspection­s and too much work to ensure contractor­s receiving city permits follow proven lead-safety work standards, and, in effect, question the value of investing time and resources into preventive solutions.

The answer is so simple it should be obvious. One child lead poisoned is one too many. Multiply that by 849, and it is gross negligence not to act now.

As to cost, the Get the Lead Out, Pittsburgh campaign (which is endorsed by our organizati­ons along with Clean Water Action, Grounded Strategies, One PA, Pittsburgh United, Penn Environmen­t and Rebuilding Together Pittsburgh) is offering to fund training for our city’s inspectors. And now that $355 million in funding is on the way from the federal government specifical­ly to address such community health issues, there are no more excuses to avoid addressing this preventabl­e problem.

Pittsburgh­ers have the opportunit­y to step up to protect children like Joseph and thousands of others. This election season, ask your candidates where they stand on lead poisoning and enacting a Pittsburgh lead safety law. Do they agree that commonsens­e practices — adopted already by cities like Cleveland, Baltimore and Buffalo — are a smart way to combat a problem that’s plagued us for decades? Or do they continue to look the other way? If so, are those the people we want in charge? Together, we can decide: How many children do we sacrifice before we take action?

You can learn more at getthelead­outpgh.org.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States