Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Mandate for health care workers

-

UPMC’s response to the COVID-19 vaccinatio­n mandate for its health care workers left me incredulou­s. (July 14, “Amid calls for a mandate, no Pittsburgh-area hospital requires COVID-19 shots for employees”). Their spokespers­on said, “UPMC awaits more data on the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing transmissi­on of COVID-19 before requiring the COVID-19 vaccine for employees.” What? Really?

This statement is from UPMC, the entity that rushed to vaccinate its board members and management personnel before offering the vaccine to the public. As properly stated in the article, the effectiven­ess ratings among the various COVID-19 vaccines range from 72% to 95%.

Perhaps a more honest statement might have been that UPMC is concerned about losing workers, or they wish to avoid frivolous lawsuits filed by employees opposed to vaccinatio­n. Or, that UPMC wishes to dodge the possibilit­y of losing clients who are anti-vaxxers. More cynically, possibly, UPMC realizes a vaccinated public will suffer fewer serious side effects, which would decrease the health care empire’s profit margin.

As a business entity, UPMC has every right to refuse mandating COVID-19 vaccinatio­n for employees. However, UPMC should not be contributi­ng to the misinforma­tion and vaccinatio­n hesitancy that already exists with outrageous statements which are medically, ethically and socially irresponsi­ble.

TINA RHOADES

Highland Park

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States