Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Yes, nurses are heroes. Let’s treat them like it

- By Linda H. Aiken Linda H. Aiken is a professor of nursing and sociology and the founding director of the Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research at the University of Pennsylvan­ia School of Nursing. This article originally appeared in The New York

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed strengths in the nation’s health care system — one of the greatest being our awesome nurses. But it also exposed many weaknesses, foremost among them being chronic nurse understaff­ing in hospitals, nursing homes and schools.

More nurses died of jobrelated COVID-19 than any other type of health care worker. The more than 1,140 U.S. nurses who lost their lives in the first year of the pandemic knew the risks to themselves and their families. And yet they stayed in harm’s way. They cared for their fallen coworkers. They went to New York from around the country to fight on the front lines in the first COVID surge. Nurses from Northwell Health in New York returned that support by deploying to the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit in December when COVID surged there.

We celebrate nurses now. We call them heroes. But if we value their sacrifices and want them to be there when we need them, we must prevent a return to the poor prepandemi­c working conditions that led to high nurse burnout and turnover rates even before COVID.

As a nurse with extensive clinical experience in hospitals, I found it nearly impossible to guarantee safe, effective and humane care to my patients. And so I establishe­d the world’s leading research center on nursing outcomes to understand the causes of nurse understaff­ing in the United States and abroad and to find solutions to the problem.

The United States has a robust supply of nurses. And there is no evidence that recruits to nursing have been deterred by COVID. To the contrary, applicatio­ns to nursing schools increased during the pandemic.

Neverthele­ss, we find ourselves too often with a shortage of nursing care. Many decades of research reveal two major reasons: First, poor working conditions, including not enough permanent employerfu­nded positions for nurses in hospitals, nursing homes and schools. And second, the failure of states to enact policies that establish and enforce safe nurse staffing; enable nurses to practice where they are needed, which is often across state borders; and modernize nurse licensing rules so that nurses can use their full education and expertise.

Training more nurses cannot solve these problems. But more responsibl­e management practices in health care, along with better state policies, could.

Not only are states not requiring safe nurse staffing, but individual­s also do not have the informatio­n and tools they need to pick hospitals and nursing homes based on nurse staffing or to advocate better staffing at their hospitals and nursing homes.

Ninety percent of the public in a recent Harris Poll agreed that hospitals and nursing homes should be required to meet safe nurse staffing standards. But powerful industry stakeholde­rs — such as hospital and nursing home organizati­ons and, often, medical societies — are strongly opposed and usually defeat legislatio­n.

The New York State Legislatur­e is the first in the postpandem­ic era to fail to approve proposed safe nurse staffing standards for hospitals. The legislatur­e passed a bill that did not require safe nursing ratios, opting instead for internal committees at hospitals to oversee nursing and patient safety. This happened despite compelling evidence that the legislatio­n would have resulted in more than 4,370 fewer deaths and saved over $720 million over a two-year study period through shorter hospital stays.

What are the solutions? While there are some actions the federal government could take, the states have most of the power because of their licensing authority over occupation­s and facilities. The hospital and nursing home industries have long failed to police their members to remove the risk of nurse understaff­ing. So states should set meaningful safe nurse staffing standards, following the example of California, where hospital nurses cannot care for more than five adult patients at a time outside of intensive care. State policies are tremendous­ly influentia­l in health care delivery and deserve greater public attention and advocacy, as they are also ripe for exploitati­on by special interests.

In states with restrictiv­e nurse licensing rules, many governors used their emergency powers during COVID surges to waive restrictio­ns. If they were not needed during a national medical emergency, why arethey needed at all?

Still, the federal government has a role to play: It should require hospitals to report patient-to-nurse staffing ratios on the Medicare Hospital Compare website, because transparen­cy motivates improvemen­t. The federal government could incentiviz­e the states to pass modelnurse practice acts.

We need influentia­l champions taking on special interests so that states will make policy changes that are in the public’s interest. AARP is using its clout to advocate nurse-friendly policies. But health insurers andcompani­es such as CVS, Walgreens and Walmart that provide health care havebeen on the sidelines.

While we long to go back to pre-COVID life, going back to chronic nurse understaff­ing in hospitals, nursing homes and schools would be a big mistake. We owe nurses and ourselves better health care resources. The so-called nurse shortage has become an excuse for not doing more to make health care safe, effective and patientcen­tered. State legislator­s must do their job. Health care leaders must fund enough positions for nurses and create reasonable working conditions so that nurses will be there to care for us all.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States