Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Republican­s say no to children

- Christophe­r Howard Christophe­r Howard is the author of “The Welfare State Nobody Knows” and one of three co-editors for “The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Social Policy.”

Despite the enormous toll of the COVID-19 pandemic, child poverty in the United States declined. According to the government’s supplement­al poverty measure, which is more accurate than the official measure, child poverty rates dropped almost by half from 2020 to 2021.

A temporary expansion of the Child Tax Credit (CTC) was a big reason why. Millions of low-income families benefited by the refundable portion of the CTC became available to all. (These families typically owe little in income taxes, so nonrefunda­ble tax credits are not much help.)

Republican­s say no

These changes were not extended beyond 2021, largely due to congressio­nal Republican­s. Low-income families are now experienci­ng more hardships, and valuable progress against child poverty has been lost. Advocates have been trying, so far unsuccessf­ully, to revive the expansion.

According to many observers, support for a child tax credit has long been bipartisan. Everyone wants to be “pro-family.” What, then, explains the unwillingn­ess of Republican­s to preserve the CTC expansion? Their recent behavior is part of a larger pattern. Since the mid-1990s, Republican­s have consistent­ly embraced a child tax credit — as long as middle-and upper-income families were the main beneficiar­ies.

The National Commission on Children recommende­d a refundable $1000 child tax credit in 1991. This money was intended to help a wide range of families. The commission, created by President Ronald Reagan, was truly bipartisan. Neverthele­ss, this proposal stalled under President George H. W. Bush.

Then came Newt Gingrich and the “Republican Revolution.” Republican­s took control of Congress and pushed for a $500 nonrefunda­ble child tax credit. They also wanted to make it difficult for low-income families to claim both this tax credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit — a strategy that favored tax cuts for the haves, not income support for the havenots.

To win Republican votes, President Bill Clinton and congressio­nal Democrats agreed in 1997 to make the new Child Tax Credit nonrefunda­ble for most families and to link eligibilit­y to the Earned Income Tax Credit. Among all taxpayers who claimed the Child Tax Credit in 2000, just 18 percent had incomes below $30,000, and they received 10 percent of the total benefits.

Initially, President George W. Bush appeared to be an exception to the Republican trend of constraini­ng the CTC. He increased the maximum child tax credit benefit and made it partly refundable for low-income families in 2001. Even so, taxpayers with less than $30,000 of income received just 15 percent of the total benefits in 2004; this suggests that Bush’s CTC increases were part of a larger political objective to disguise the regressive nature of his other tax cuts.

Obama and Trump

Low-income families fared better under President Barack Obama. The child tax credit was modified twice in 2009, once in 2010, and again in 2012. By 2016, taxpayers earning less than $30,000 accounted for approximat­ely one-third of CTC recipients and benefits. Republican­s in Congress tried to reverse those gains, to no avail.

President Donald Trump’s biggest domestic policy victory was the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted in 2017 without Democrats’ support. Trump took credit for a major expansion of the Child Tax Credit, which doubled in size.

This fact alone, however, obscures the biggest winners of this policy shift. By 2020, taxpayers earning less than $30,000 represente­d 23 percent of CTC recipients and collected just 15 percent of the benefits — a big drop compared to 2016. Over this same period the share of benefits going to taxpayers with incomes above $100,000 jumped from 18 to 41 percent.

This result was predictabl­e given that the income limit for eligible families increased significan­tly (e.g., from $110,000 to $400,000 for married couples filing jointly). The strong tilt in favor of affluent families was widely noted at the time. Republican­s, who expressed the belief that low-income families could get help from other government programs, appeared to view this change as a feature, not a bug.

The historic expansion of the Child Tax Credit in 2021 happened despite Republican objections. As the Associated Press noted at the time, “Republican­s charge the move amounts to an expansion of the welfare state that will disincenti­vize parents from seeking work.”

They also worried about budget deficits, taxpayer fraud, and subsidizin­g single-parent families. Republican officials were a lot less concerned about these issues when expanding the CTC for upper-income families.

The bottom line

Although the child tax credit has enjoyed bipartisan support for three decades, Democrats and Republican­s have often disagreed over which families should benefit. Republican officials have cared more about cutting the taxes of affluent families than reducing child poverty.

Unless Democrats have unified control of government (or the country experience­s another crisis), it is unlikely that the child tax credit will be restored to its 2021 condition. Advocates looking to help low-income families under divided government might need instead to pursue incrementa­l changes to the CTC or the EITC or look to legislatio­n at the state level.

 ?? Hanna Webster ?? Jen Stoyer, 40, with her kids Madi, 12, and Jackson, 9. Jen has attended the festival for her whole life and has now included her children in the tradition. Her mother was raised in a house on 39th street.
Hanna Webster Jen Stoyer, 40, with her kids Madi, 12, and Jackson, 9. Jen has attended the festival for her whole life and has now included her children in the tradition. Her mother was raised in a house on 39th street.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States