Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Pa.’s internet expansion money may run short

- By Kris B. Mamula

Two utility workers: One handles high-voltage power lines, often at great heights, where risks include arc flashes, electric shock, falls and thermal burns.

The second works closer to the ground with low-voltage coaxial cables or fiber-optic lines, which don’t carry live current.

The state Department of Labor & Industry classifies both jobs as “electric linemen,” despite the difference­s in the workplace hazards and necessary skills. In Pennsylvan­ia, the prevailing wage rate for electric linemen last year was an annual median of $86,280, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

A Harrisburg-based trade associatio­n thinks that’s a problem.

The pay rate for internet cable installers means that $1.2 billion in federal broadband expansion money that’s coming to Pennsylvan­ia in 2025 will not go as far unless workers in the less-hazardous jobs are paid more appropriat­ely, according to the Broadband Communicat­ions Associatio­n of Pennsylvan­ia.

“It calls for a different skill set and we believe a different wage rate,” associatio­n President Todd Eachus told the state Broadband Developmen­t Authority Board Nov. 30. “The money won’t go as far and not everybody gets connected. That’s exactly our concern — we need to make sure the dollars go as far as we can to get to every Pennsylvan­ian.”

Instead of a median annual rate of $86,280, the associatio­n says the appropriat­e median wage for cable installers should be $60,190 or 30% less, based on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ telecommun­ications job classifica­tion. In addition to the federal Department of Labor, Massachuse­tts, New York and Wisconsin also differenti­ate cable workers from overhead linemen.

All of this matters because Pennsylvan­ia is preparing to submit a

proposal by the end of the month to the National Telecommun­ications & Informatio­n Administra­tion for Broadband Equity Access & Deployment grant funding. And contractor­s who receive funding for broadband expansion projects will be required to pay workers at prevailing wage rates, which are determined by geographic location.

Because Pennsylvan­ia doesn’t distinguis­h between the two utility workers, cable splicers and installers will receive the premium wage, with few of the hazards or training necessary for high-voltage linemen. That means the $1.2 billion in BEAD funding that’s earmarked for broadband expansion in Pennsylvan­ia in 2025 won’t go as far as it could, according to the associatio­n.

“Multiple government agencies and labor unions recognize the distinctio­n between electric and teledata linemen,” the associatio­n wrote in July to the state Department of Labor & Industry, asking for the creation of a new category for teledata workers. “Teledata linemen do not require the same licensing as electric linemen.”

A spokesman for the Department of Labor & Industry acknowledg­ed receipt of the associatio­n’s letter but said a formal appeal, which is necessary to change classifica­tions on existing projects, has not been received.

BEAD funding, which is expected to be distribute­d next year, covers 75% of project costs while recipients are responsibl­e for coming up with the remaining 25% of funding. Broadband subscripti­ons are expected to ensure network viability, but Mr. Eachus worries the higher labor rates could hobble system sustainabi­lity.

In Pennsylvan­ia, 235,854 locations do not have internet service, which is about 5% of the total 4.8 million serviceabl­e locations in the state, according to the latest Federal Communicat­ions Commission map, said Mike Conlow, a broadband data and internet policy analyst.

That’s 42,681 fewer unserved places than were in the FCC map released in June as county government­s have used other sources of federal funding to extend internet service and challenges to the earlier map are resolved.

Even without the BEAD money, which has been described as once in a generation funding, Western Pennsylvan­ia counties have been pressing ahead with broadband expansion plans.

Washington County, for example, advertised for proposals to expand coverage to 169 locations Dec. 1, covering 1,084 unique sites, which it called a “pivotal moment in the county’s mission to bridge the digital divide and improve connectivi­ty for its residents.” Contract awards for the fourth phase of the county’s broadband expansion plan were expected in mid-2024.

“We are eager to review the proposals and work toward enhancing the digital landscape of our communitie­s,” Commission­er Electra Janis said in a prepared statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States