Porterville Recorder

Why affirmativ­e action?

- Michael Carley Michael Carley is a resident of Portervill­e. He can be reached at mcarley@gmail.com.

A recent report suggested that the Sessions Justice Department is considerin­g using resources currently devoted to pursuing civil rights investigat­ions to instead investigat­e colleges for discrimina­tion against white students. The reality of what is being pursued may be more complex, but this action would align with Sessions’ history and the Trump administra­tion’s general hostility to civil rights and equal protection.

But, given that Trump supporters, according to polls, seem to believe that whites face more discrimina­tion than other groups, perhaps they are simply playing to their base of angry, falsely aggrieved white men.

This might be a good time then, to explain exactly what affirmativ­e action is, and just as importantl­y, what it isn’t.

For some reason, when people think of affirmativ­e action, their minds immediatel­y go to racial hiring quotas or quotas on college admissions. In fact, quotas have been illegal, per a Supreme Court ruling, for nearly 40 years.

But even without quotas, organizati­ons can, and should, set goals for working toward diversity in hiring.

Let’s recall where the term “affirmativ­e action” actually comes from. People tend to assume that once we passed a few anti-discrimina­tion laws, the work was over. Discrimina­tion would come to an end and everyone would be judged on merit.

Reality was far from this fantasy. None of us could magically will equality into existence. Therefore, there was a need to take action to affirm our anti-discrimina­tion laws.

The term originates from a pair of executive orders, signed by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson in the 1960s. These required government and government contractor­s to “take affirmativ­e action” to reach the goal of non-discrimina­tion in the areas of race, religion, and national origin. Affirmativ­e action in gender was added in 1967 and it likely has had the biggest impact.

Affirmativ­e action exists for several reasons. One is to deal with a history of discrimina­tion against disfavored groups. Some use the example of a foot race where one person or group is held back for a period of time while others get a head start, then the favored group acts as though everything is equal when somewhere in the middle of the race, the barriers are lifted.

But affirmativ­e action exists not just to remedy past discrimina­tion, but current bias. Not all discrimina­tion is easily caught and dealt with in the law, but more importantl­y, most discrimina­tion isn’t even intentiona­l.

It is simply a fact that a group of people, making a hiring decision, will likely hire people most like themselves. If that group consists largely of white, middleclas­s, profession­al men, absent substantia­l efforts to ensure otherwise, the bulk of hiring will likely be of a similar sort.

Affirmativ­e action is geared toward countering such implicit biases. It involves reaching out to make sure that hiring decisions are made by a diverse group of people and that the hiring pool itself is diverse. If these things are done, and a conscious effort is made to ensure that processes are fair, the result will likely be closer to justice than otherwise.

This is especially important in some fields as hiring has often been made based on the basis of contacts and family history. Occupation­s such as constructi­on, police officers, and firefighte­rs often fit this category as these careers are often multi-generation­al, making it difficult for previously excluded groups to break in, even if no intentiona­l effort is made to exclude them.

Affirmativ­e action is not, and never has been, about promoting unqualifie­d people over qualified ones. In fact, the assumption that this is the case is a bias of itself, as it assumes that the previously favored groups: usually white men, are somehow always more qualified.

While quotas are illegal, it is helpful to track the number of applicants in a hiring pool and compare it to the demographi­cs one of the population one is serving or drawing from. Where those demographi­cs change rapidly, no affirmativ­e action will be able to keep up, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try.

Lastly, affirmativ­e action exists, because diversity itself is an important value. It matters because the world of the future will be a diverse one, containing people from all genders, racial background­s, religions, sexual orientatio­ns, etc. So, we attempt to reflect that future diversity, not only to be fair to the individual­s being considered, but more importantl­y because the outcome is that we generate a society in which all individual­s and all groups are well represente­d and in which their talents are allowed to flourish.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States