Porterville Recorder

Democratic and Republican lawmakers: Memo doesn’t clear Trump in probe

- By HOPE YEN

WASHINGTON — Democratic and Republican lawmakers said Sunday that a Gopproduce­d congressio­nal memo on FBI surveillan­ce powers did not clear President Donald Trump in the Russia investigat­ion, and they expressed hope that special counsel Robert Mueller’s work would continue without interferen­ce.

The top Democrat on the Republican-led House Intelligen­ce Committee that released the memo called it “a political hit job” and questioned whether GOP Rep. Devin Nunes, the committee chairman, had coordinate­d with the White House in drafting it.

“The goal here is to undermine the FBI, discredit the FBI, discredit the Mueller investigat­ion, do the president’s bidding,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-calif. Schiff said he raised motions to have the committee question the FBI first and review the full supporting material before releasing the memo but was “voted down” by Nunes and other GOP committee members.

“I think it’s very possible his staff worked with the White House,” he said.

Nunes has for months faced criticism about his close ties to the White House. He had previously apologized for sharing with the White House secret intelligen­ce intercepts related to a probe of Russian election interferen­ce before talking to committee members. When asked during a committee meeting in late January whether he had coordinate­d the memo with the White House, he at first said “as far as I know, no,” then refused to answer when asked whether his staff members had communicat­ed with the White House.

The memo, released Friday, alleges misconduct

on the part of the FBI and the Justice Department in obtaining a warrant under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to monitor former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser Carter Page and his ties to Russia. Specifical­ly, it takes aim at the FBI’S use of informatio­n from former British spy Christophe­r Steele, who compiled a dossier containing allegation­s of ties between Trump, his associates and Russia.

Rep. Chris Stewart, R-utah, said the memo doesn’t end the need for the Mueller investigat­ion.

“I think it would be a mistake for anyone to suggest that the special counsel shouldn’t complete his work. I support his work. I want him to finish it. I hope

he finishes it as quickly as possible. This memo has frankly nothing at all to do with the special counsel,” said Stewart, a member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

Denying a political motive, Republican committee members defended the release of the GOP memo as appropriat­e. Saying it did not vindicate Trump, as the president asserted Saturday, they signaled the possible release of Democrats’ dissenting memo in the coming weeks and said the GOP memo would have no impact on Mueller’s ongoing probe.

Rep. Will Hurd, Rtexas, said he had opposed the release of Democrats’ memo last week on national security grounds but fully expected a fresh vote on

the matter after Democrats make revisions.

“The informatio­n wasn’t ready to go, and so we decided to release ours,” he said. “People can criticize that - that decision, but I think providing oversight and shining a light on these issues is important.”

Trump tweeted Saturday that the memo puts him in the clear.

“This memo totally vindicates ‘Trump’ in probe,” he said. “But the Russian Witch Hunt goes on and on. Their (sic) was no Collusion and there was no Obstructio­n (the word now used because, after one year of looking endlessly and finding NOTHING, collusion is dead). This is an American disgrace!”

The underlying materials that served as the basis for the warrant applicatio­n

were not made public in the memo. Even as Democrats described it as inaccurate, some Republican­s quickly cited the memo — released over the objections of the FBI and Justice Department — in their arguments that Mueller’s investigat­ion is politicall­y tainted.

The memo’s central allegation is that agents and prosecutor­s, in applying in October 2016 to monitor Page’s communicat­ions, failed to tell a judge that the opposition research that provided grounds for the FBI’S suspicion received funding from Hillary Clinton’s presidenti­al campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Page had stopped advising the campaign sometime around the end of that summer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States