Porterville Recorder

Is President Trump for real immigratio­n reform?

- Raoul Lowery Contreras Raoul Lowery Contreras is a conservati­ve columnist. His column appears on Fridays in The Recorder. He can be contacted at hispanicco­mmentator@gmail.com.

President Donald J. Trump apparently does not want to solve the immigratio­n fiasco we live with. The last real and sincere effort to reform immigratio­n was killed by Senate Democrat Majority Leader Harry Reid with full compliance by then newly elected Illinois Senator Barack Obama. That immigratio­n reform was sponsored by President George W. Bush in 2006-7.

If President Trump is serious and really wants a decent immigratio­n system, he will immediatel­y set aside a weekend at Camp David in Maryland and invite the congressio­nal leadership of both parties, including committee chairs, relevant cabinet members with their Chiefs of Staff, generals and admirals of the military branches and top intelligen­ce officials. Attendance would be mandatory, and the attendees would be required to bring all suggestion­s they have for immigratio­n reform and any documentar­y evidence that supports their ideas and suggestion­s.

He would tell the assemblage he wants a consensus bill by the end of the meeting, a new immigratio­n law. That they would meet until the bill was drafted and no one could leave until the bill was signed off by a majority. He would then tell them that he would schedule a national television speech from the White House in prime time and that each of their names would be listed as supporters of the bill. He would endorse the bill during the speech. He would expect that both Houses of Congress would take up the bills in regular order but be limited to 30 or 45 days from start to final vote. Maybe 60 days would be the maximum limit.

The President would enthusiast­ically support the consensus bill he demanded at his emergency immigratio­n conference in the television address as did George W. Bush did in 2006. Trump would swear that he will not change his mind. He would ask for support from his specific political base as he would ask of all other elements of the American polity.

“We must get this done,” would be vigorously manifested in the speech and in letters to Congress.

What might this bill contain that the President could support?

1. A ten percent increase in Border Patrol and ICE agents to staff border and interior enforcemen­t.

2. Rebuilding of present border fencing with a reasonable budget.

3. Design and constructi­on of new border fencing to be specified with funds allocated for, by Congress.

4. A new streamline­d, employer based work visa for specific work areas in agricultur­e, constructi­on, hospitalit­y, high-tech & STEM (Science, tech, math and engineerin­g) endeavors.

5. Mandatory E-verify (legal ability to work in the U.S.) for all employees, including those already working. The system would be designed and implemente­d under contract with immediate appeals in federal court to rectify any mistakes. As jobs are the primary reason people come to the U.S. illegally, the problem would be mostly solved.

6. To satisfy the President, the bill would limit immigratio­n somewhat to a figure all could agree with; family reunificat­ion could be limited to parents, children and siblings; immigratio­n could then shift to merit qualificat­ions and, perhaps age.

7. Today’s five-year requiremen­t for citizenshi­p applicatio­n could be lengthened to ten years and allow “Dreamers” (eligible young people brought to the U.S. illegally when they were children with a cutoff year) to apply after the ten years of legalized presence for the 1.8 million “Dreamers” the President has said he would like to see be permanentl­y legalized.

All the trading and negotiatin­g needed to arrive at this consensus bill would be done at Camp David and the President would commit to supporting the bill no matter if some of his demands weren’t satisfied. Ditto the desires of partisan congress people of either party.

If, the President is truly committed to immigratio­n reform, considerin­g he calls our present immigratio­n laws the “worst” in the world, he needs to call this conference and to lock the conference up until it produces a bill and he must pledge to support the bill, period.

Then, and only then, can he rightfully claim to be the President of al the United States without a large majority of Americans laughing-out-loud.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States