Porterville Recorder

California praises Supreme Court ruling on census

- By KATHLEEN RONAYNE

SACRAMENTO — California Democrats who sued the Trump administra­tion over its attempts to put a citizenshi­p question on the census praised the Supreme Court's ruling Thursday that kept the question on hold.

However, they also warned that the administra­tion has already incited fear that will make it harder to count people in immigrant communitie­s.

"The Trump administra­tion has not been denied the fear and anxiety that he has caused and induced - and that is still very present," Gov. Gavin Newsom said during a news conference.

The census is a count every 10 years of people living in the United States that's used to determine how many seats in Congress and how much federal money each state gets.

The Trump administra­tion wanted to add a citizenshi­p question on the 2020 count. Opponents and the Census Bureau's own experts said the move would prompt some immigrants not to fill out the form and lead to a massive undercount particular­ly in states such as California with large immigrant population­s.

"It appears that we have defeated, at least for now, the Trump administra­tion's efforts to turn the census into the latest partisan political tool," said California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, who is in charge of California's efforts to administer the census.

California received about $77 billion in census-related funding in 2015, according to the Public Policy Institute of California.

Padilla said it will take a massive public awareness and outreach campaign — including reminders that the Census Bureau is supposed to keep individual­s' informatio­n confidenti­al — to ensure California gets a complete count.

Newsom's message to California­ns was direct: "If you don't participat­e, Trump wins," he said. The census count begins on April 1.

California plans to spend $154 million on census outreach efforts through partnershi­ps with community groups, schools, Native American tribes and non-english media. The state considers communitie­s in large swaths of the agricultur­ally dominant Central Valley and Inland Empire "hard to count."

The court's 5-4 ruling, with the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, said the administra­tion's explanatio­n for including the question was contrived.

The evidence, it said, didn't support Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross's explanatio­n that a citizenshi­p question would aid in enforcemen­t of the Voting Rights Act.

The issue was sent back to a lower court.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said its conceivabl­e the administra­tion could try to write a new justificat­ion for the lower court, but other opponents of the question said the administra­tion may have run out of time.

The Census Bureau did not immediatel­y say if it would continue to pursue the question.

 ?? AP PHOTO BY J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE ?? Demonstrat­ors gather at the Supreme Court as the justices finish the term with key decisions on gerrymande­ring and a census case involving an attempt by the Trump administra­tion to ask everyone about their citizenshi­p status in the 2020 census, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 27.
AP PHOTO BY J. SCOTT APPLEWHITE Demonstrat­ors gather at the Supreme Court as the justices finish the term with key decisions on gerrymande­ring and a census case involving an attempt by the Trump administra­tion to ask everyone about their citizenshi­p status in the 2020 census, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States