Porterville Recorder

Democrats debate the repeal of Section 1325

-

During the first Democratic presidenti­al debate of the 2020 race, former Housing and Urban Developmen­t secretary Julián Castro challenged all candidates to join his call for the repeal of a controvers­ial immigratio­n law.

The law, Section 1325 of Title 8 of the U.S. Code, makes entering the United States “at any time or place other than as designated by immigratio­n officers” a federal crime.

It’s among the most prosecuted federal crimes in the United States. Thousands of defendants are charged with violating Section 1325 each month.

The government shouldn’t “criminaliz­e desperatio­n,” Castro argued. Instead, he advocated, it should treat the unlawful entry of undocument­ed migrants as “a civil violation.” That is, migrants who enter the United States without permission should be deported, not incarcerat­ed.

Castro acknowledg­ed that several other candidates on the stage in Miami, including Sen. Cory Booker, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, already agree with him.

But others, like former congressma­n Beto O’rourke, don’t support Section 1325’s repeal.

“I don’t think it’s asking too much for people to follow our laws when they come to this country,” O’rourke said.

During the second night of the debates, which featured a slate of another 10 Democratic hopefuls, most of the candidates on stage indicated their support for the measure’s repeal. The backstory The United States placed few legal restrictio­ns on crossing borders prior to the 1920s. Even then, entering the U.S. without authorizat­ion wasn’t a crime. Deportatio­ns could be effected through civil legal process.

With Section 1325, Congress made “improper entry by alien” a crime in 1929 – soon after imposing strict immigratio­n quotas based on national origin.

According to University of California Los Angeles historian Kelly Lytle Hernandez, white supremacis­t South Carolina Sen. Coleman Livingston Blease was its architect.

Criminal enforcemen­t, however, remained rare for decades – even when the deportatio­n of Mexican Americans surged in the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. Prosecutio­ns based on Section 1325 only started ramping up in the first decade of this century, during President George W. Bush’s administra­tion. Family separation Due to the Justice Department’s current “zero tolerance” policy, anyone who can be charged under Section 1325 should be charged with a misdemeano­r. That has, in thousands of cases, included parents traveling with children. Once charged with this federal crime, parents must be taken into the custody of the U.S. Marshals – where children are not allowed.

The White House publicly disowned this policy in June 2018, just days before a U.S. District Court judge ordered the government to reunify all separated families. Yet this practice has continued at the border.

Based on my research about the federal prosecutio­n of immigratio­n crimes, I’m confident that repealing Section 1325 would not increase the number of undocument­ed people living in the United States.

Anyone without authorizat­ion to live in this country would continue to be subject to deportatio­n, a remedy the Supreme Court has called “burdensome and severe.”

This article was written by Kit Johnson University of Oklahoma and is republishe­d from The Conversati­on under a Creative Commons license. The Conversati­on is an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States