Porterville Recorder

Federal charges ramp up pressure on R. Kelly to make deal

- By MICHAEL TARM Associated Press

CHICAGO (AP) — R. Kelly couldn’t be faulted if he felt some confidence he could beat the sex charges brought by Cook County prosecutor­s earlier this year. He had beaten them before, winning acquittal on all counts in a 2008 child pornograph­y trial.

Any confidence the R&B star may have felt likely melted away last month, though, when he was indicted on federal charges in New York and Chicago. Federal prosecutor­s secure conviction­s more than 90% of the time, whereas their state counterpar­ts’ conviction rate hovers around 65%, court records show.

Federal prosecutor­s have far more resources and face less political pressure, so they can take their time building a case until they believe it is air-tight.

“Federal charges are the major leagues. It’s a completely different ballgame for Kelly now,” said Phil Turner, a former assistant U.S. attorney in Chicago.

The federal charges will increase pressure on Kelly to seek a plea deal, which is what the overwhelmi­ng majority of defendants in federal cases do.

The 40 counts Kelly faces, including two state counts brought this week in Minnesota, carry a combined maximum prison sentence of more than 500 years, meaning Kelly could spend the rest of his life behind bars if he loses badly at trial. A favorable deal may be the 52-year-old singer’s only chance of leaving prison before he turns 70.

Federal prosecutor­s likely aren’t in any rush to negotiate a deal so soon after filing charges, but they might eventually be open to one. Celebrity trials can be unpredicta­ble, so there might be a greater chance of an acquittal or a hung jury. A deal would also spare Kelly’s accusers the trauma having to testify and save U.S. attorneys’ offices time and money.

Any negotiatio­ns would be complicate­d, as Kelly is charged in four jurisdicti­ons and his lawyers would likely insist on a single deal that resolves all the cases. And prosecutor­s would only accept a deal that includes a lengthy prison term, said Gal Pissetzky, a Chicago trial lawyer who has represente­d multiple clients in plea discussion­s with the U.S. attorney’s office.

“After so many years gone by with the allegation­s around Kelly, there is no way the feds are going to say, ‘You know, you’re right. We’ll drop the most serious charges and let you plead out for a lower sentence,” he said.

For the next few months, defense attorneys are likely to concentrat­e on trying to get weaker charges dismissed. They’ve spoken about challengin­g charges on doublejeop­ardy grounds, arguing that some are based on conduct for which Kelly was acquitted in 2008.

Kelly has pleaded not guilty to all the charges — except the new ones in Minnesota, where he will be arraigned later. The 21 Illinois state charges accuse him of sexually abusing three girls and a woman over a roughly 10-year period starting in the late 1990s. The two Minnesota charges, prostituti­on and solicitati­on, allege that he invited a 17-year-old girl to his hotel room in 2001 and paid her $200 to dance naked with him.

The 13 federal counts brought in Chicago accuse him of, among other things, filming himself having sex with underage girls and of paying off potential witnesses in his 2008 trial to get them to change their stories. The New York federal charges accuse Kelly of running a racketeeri­ng enterprise that arranged for girls to have sex with the singer. Prosecutor­s say Kelly had a list of rules to control girls, including requiring them not to look at other men and to eat only with his permission.

Defense attorney Douglas Anton argued in a recent filing in the New York case that Kelly’s accusers were disgruntle­d “groupies” who “pined to be with” Kelly and “fought each other” for his attention. He said prosecutor­s made “the stretch of all stretches” by arguing that the efforts by Kelly and his entourage to accommodat­e his adoring fans amounted to racketeeri­ng.

Kelly’s negotiatin­g position doesn’t seem particular­ly strong.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States