Porterville Recorder

Plenty of propositio­ns on ballot

November election to have 12 measures

- By CHARLES WHISNAND cwhisnand@portervill­erecorder.com

The deadline has passed for the requiremen­ts to be met for propositio­ns to be placed on the November ballot in California.

California­ns rose to the challenge in meeting that deadline as no less than 12 statewide ballot measures will be consider by voters in California’s November election.

Eight of the propositio­ns are on the ballot thanks to special interest groups collecting enough signatures. The other four were added by the State Legislatur­e as each propose to amend the state Constituti­on.

The one measure that will likely be the most fought over is an attempt to partially roll back one of California’s most famous propositio­ns in history, Propositio­n 13 that significan­tly cut property taxes in the state in a tax revolt in 1978. But there are those in California who now say that propositio­n has gone too far and are looking for the requiremen­ts of Propositio­n 13 to be rolled back in November as far as what property taxes have to be paid by some businesses and industries.

Propositio­n 15 would raise commercial property taxes on some businesses and industry. The measure would create a new set of rules in which the caps on raising property taxes would be removed and would be based on marketrate values for commercial and industrial properties. The change would be phased in over three years.

Proponents of the measure say it’s designed to provide more funding for schools and health care. Proponents also say mostly wealthy businesses would be affected, stating only six percent of businesses would pay 78 percent of the taxes.

One nonpartisa­n analysis said the measure would raise $12.5 billion a year. Democratic-leaning groups such as organized labor and those in edu

cation support the measure. No surprising businesses are opposed. The fight over this measure promises to be bitter — and expensive.

Other propositio­ns are the November ballot are:

Propositio­n 14: Would provide more borrowing to finance stem cell research. It’s been 16 years since California­ns approved borrowing $3 billion for stem cell research and that money is almost gone. Propositio­n 14 would issue $5.5 billion in bonds for stem cell research.

Propositio­n 16: This could be another controvers­ial measure as it would restore affirmativ­e action in how the state awards contracts and how students are selected for college. Affirmativ­e action was outlawed in the state in 1996.

Propositio­n 17: Would allow those released on parole to vote.

Propositio­n 18: Would allow 17-yearolds to vote in primary elections if they turn 18 by the general election. As an example, 17-year-olds would have been allowed to vote in the March primary election if they turned 18 by the November election.

Propositio­n 19: This is a propositio­n that deals with property tax breaks. California homeowners 55 and older would keep their property tax payment the same even if they buy a new home. The measure is designed to encourage older residents to buy homes. Older homeowners who lose their home to a wildfire would also have their property tax break exapnded.

But the measure also cracks down on parents who transfer their home to their children. This is designed to crack down on wealthy homeowners and narrows the tax break to homes being lived in by the owner. It’s expected this part of the measure would generate revenue that would go to firefighti­ng efforts.

Propositio­n 20: California has made efforts in recent years to reduce the punishment­s for some crimes. This propositio­n would put back in place some of those punishment­s that were reduced. The propositio­n would place new limits on some of the sentence reductions that have happened in the state.

Propositio­n 21: This could be another hotly contested propositio­n as it’s a response to the state’s efforts to institute rent control. The propositio­n would place some limits on caps that local government­s can place on rent increases.

Propositio­n 22: This propositio­n is on another issue that has gain a lot of attention as it’s designed to roll back Assembly Bill 5, which required many independen­t contractor­s in the state to be designated as employees. The propositio­n is for the “gig economy” and compains such as Uber and Lyft to give them more flexibilit­y as far as how their drivers would be designated. In short, Uber and Lyft drivers would be designated as independen­t contractor­s.

Propositio­n 23: This propositio­n is designed to provide more oversight to kidney dialysis clinics.

Propositio­n 24: Another hot top issue, new consumer privacy rules went into effect in California on

Propositio­n 25: Another one of the numerous hot topics on the ballot. This propositio­n is a referendum on the 2018 law passed that would abolish cash bail.

In a nutshell, the law would work like this: No longer could cash be offered to those who can’t pay for early released. Judges would be given wide discretion on who can be released prior to trial. Defendents deemed to be a danger to society would be held in “preventive detention.”

A yes vote would approve the law and end cash bail. A no vote would keep the cash bail system as it is.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States