Porterville Recorder

Not Real News: A look at what didn’t happen this week

-

A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out. Here are the facts:

Vaccinated people aren’t nine times more likely to be hospitaliz­ed

CLAIM: People who are vaccinated against COVID-19 are nine times more likely to be hospitaliz­ed than those who are unvaccinat­ed.

THE FACTS: The false assertion that vaccinated people are more likely to be hospitaliz­ed is based on one former physician assistant’s claim that 90% of all patients admitted to her hospital during a recent period were vaccinated against COVID-19. But the hospital records show the vaccinatio­n rate was far lower and there was no evidence of any connection between vaccinatio­n status and the various illnesses that led to the hospitaliz­ations. A post circulatin­g on Instagram last month cites a blog post by a lawyer representi­ng Deborah Conrad, a former physician’s assistant at United Memorial Medical Center in Batavia, New York, to falsely claim that people are “9x more likely to be hospitaliz­ed if they are vaccinated over unvaccinat­ed patients.” Conrad wrote to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Food and Drug Administra­tion earlier this year warning of possible “serious injuries from COVID-19 vaccines.” In the blog post, it notes that Conrad saw the number of patients in the hospital had “increased dramatical­ly” and claimed that 90% of them were vaccinated against COVID. The hospital disputes her figures. Conrad provides no informatio­n for when the patients she reported were hospitaliz­ed, and her spokespeop­le declined to clarify. Her letter was sent in July 2021, and in it, she claims to have alerted the FDA of her concerns in April and May. Hospital records show that in July, just 60% of the facility’s inpatients had received the vaccine, according to Rochester Regional Health spokespers­on Jillian Parker. In early April, 15% of hospital patients were vaccinated. And on May 24, 25% of the hospital patients were vaccinated. Conrad also argued that she found an increase in various illnesses — including blood clots, Bell’s palsy, pneumonia and strokes — after the initial roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine. She logged these in VAERS, or the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which allows anyone to submit reports. But VAERS reports are not verified and do not prove that the illnesses are connected to the vaccine. In a response to The Associated Press, Conrad’s legal team acknowledg­ed that she “did not speculate on causation and only did what she was obligated to do: report to VAERS any adverse event following vaccinatio­n that led to hospitaliz­ation.” No doctors or experts at the hospital raised the same concerns about a rise of these illnesses, Parker said. Parker acknowledg­ed that admissions had gone up at the time, but said the hospital attributed the rise to other factors, including patients deferring care during the height of the COVID pandemic, or scheduling elective surgery that was put off. Conrad’s lawyer said she “stands by her observatio­ns and her reporting.” Several experts told the AP that studies have shown serious side effects from the vaccine to be rare. And many of the illnesses Conrad listed — including Bell’s palsy, pneumonia and strokes — are not known side effects of the shots, they said. “The vaccine is not causing all of these conditions that she’s concerned about,” said Dr. Melanie Swift, the associate medical director for occupation­al health service at the Mayo Clinic. As more of the country is vaccinated, the community’s vaccinatio­n rate will be reflected in hospitals’ patients, she explained. Blood clots have been one of the rare side effects of the vaccine and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was briefly paused in 2020 over those concerns. But federal regulators allowed the shots to resume less than two weeks later after the risk was found to be rare.

Queensland is not punishing unvaccinat­ed people for coughing in public

CLAIM: Australia is punishing unvaccinat­ed people who cough or sneeze in public with fines and jail time.

THE FACTS: Authoritie­s in Queensland, Australia, are not punishing unvaccinat­ed people who cough or sneeze in public. However, people who intentiona­lly spit, cough or sneeze on public officials or workers, or threaten to do so, face fines and jail time under an April 2020 public health order issued amid the COVID-19 pandemic. In December 2021, Queensland officials announced that the policy, which applies to both vaccinated and unvaccinat­ed people, would be expanded to include more types of workers. Inaccurate claims regarding the directive have since circulated widely on social media. One erroneous tweet posted Sunday falsely claimed that “from the 17th of December, The Unvaccinat­ed will be fined up to $13,000 or 6 months in prison, for offences such as sneezing or coughing in public.” The claims leave out the fact that the policy, which isn’t new, only applies to deliberate acts of sneezing, coughing, or spitting on public officials or workers, as well as threats to do so, according to Queensland officials. “These measures aren’t targeting unvaccinat­ed people. If you go into a retail store or a coffee shop or anywhere and deliberate­ly cough on someone with the intent of causing fear, it doesn’t matter if you’re vaccinated or not, you’re causing an offense,” a spokespers­on for Queensland Health told The Associated Press. Earlier this month, Queensland officials announced that they would relax COVID-19 measures for businesses and add a variety of new restrictio­ns for unvaccinat­ed people. As part of the new measures, the existing policy regarding intentiona­l coughing, sneezing, or spitting will be expanded to include such deliberate acts against hospitalit­y workers. Violating the directive is punishable by fines up to $13,785 or a maximum of six months imprisonme­nt. The policy covers workers while they are at their place of work and during their commutes to and from work. The current directive states that there are “increasing reports of people intentiona­lly spitting at or coughing or sneezing on public officials and workers during the COVID-19 declared public health emergency.” During a Dec. 7 press conference, Yvette D’ath, the Queensland minister for health and ambulance services, said that the measure was intended to “protect” workers from “appalling behavior” while they were just trying to do their jobs.

Santa wasn’t arrested for mask violation at German market

CLAIM: Santa was arrested at a Christmas market in Germany because he wasn’t wearing a mask.

THE FACTS: A man in a Santa costume was detained by police at a Christmas market in Stralsund, Germany, but police said it was because he refused to show identifica­tion at an unregister­ed protest against vaccine mandates, not because he wasn’t wearing a mask. A video circulatin­g on Twitter shows a man dressed like Santa being escorted out of a Christmas market in Germany. The video is accompanie­d by claims on social media saying he refused to wear a mask. A statement issued by the Stralsund Police said that authoritie­s responded late Monday to a report of an unregister­ed gathering at the ‘Old Market’ square in Stralsund, where about 65 people had gathered and “appeared to be voicing their opinion on the current coronaviru­s measures and a vaccine mandate.” Parliament last week approved compulsory vaccinatio­ns for health care profession­als, but a general vaccine mandate isn’t in force. Officers asked participan­ts to show their IDS, noting that the gathering wasn’t registered and therefore constitute­d a criminal offense for the organizer. The man dressed as Santa, who wasn’t working at the Christmas market, refused to provide his name to officers, according to the report, and pulled away as police escorted him out. The police statement said a complaint was made against the 47-year-old local man “on suspicion of resisting law enforcemen­t officers,” among other allegation­s. He was released by police that evening after being identified. The incident is similar to another case elsewhere in Germany this month. A video claimed to show an elderly woman being detained by police because she didn’t have a vaccine passport. However, police said the woman, 80, was being briefly detained during an unauthoriz­ed protest because she did not provide German authoritie­s with identifica­tion. Witnesses confirmed the police account. According to authoritie­s, only IDS were checked on the scene, not vaccinatio­n passports.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States