Porterville Recorder

Falling faith in democracy isn’t new

- Byron York is chief political correspond­ent for The Washington Examiner.

For the last year, we’ve heard one commentato­r after another tell us American democracy is in crisis. The source of that crisis, we’re told, is a hard core of the Republican Party that believes the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and Joe Biden, therefore, isn’t a legitimate president.

It’s true a significan­t number of Americans don’t accept the results of the election. But is that something new, as the Trump-focused analyses would have us believe? No, it’s not. Yes, these days, it’s Republican­s who doubt the results of a presidenti­al election. But just a few years ago, it was Democrats. Lots of Democrats.

As a matter of fact, Americans today have more faith in the results of the 2020 election than had faith in the results of the 2016 election. More Americans believe Biden’s election was legitimate than believed, at the same point in Trump’s presidency, Trump’s election was legitimate. This isn’t a new problem. Just look at the latest poll from The Washington Post and the University of Maryland. The pollsters asked this simple question: “Regardless of whom you supported in the 2020 election, do you think Joe Biden’s election as president was legitimate, or was he not legitimate­ly elected?” Sixty-nine percent of respondent­s said Biden’s election was legitimate, while 29 percent said it wasn’t legitimate.

Compare that to a poll from the same group with the same wording in October 2017, eight months into Trump’s presidency: “Regardless of whom you supported in the 2016 election, do you think Donald Trump’s election as president was legitimate, or was he not legitimate­ly elected?” Back then, 57 percent said Trump’s election was legitimate, while 42 percent said it wasn’t legitimate.

Which means a few years ago, more people refused to accept the results of the election than today! In the new poll, the problem is Republican­s — 58 percent of them say Biden wasn’t legitimate­ly elected. But back in 2017, the problem was Democrats – 67 percent of them said Trump was not legitimate­ly elected.

Do you remember 24/7 commentary bemoaning the refusal of Democrats to accept the election of Trump as legitimate? Neither do I.

The situation in which Democrats refused to accept Trump as legitimate was far different from a few years earlier, when huge majorities saw Barack Obama’s election as legitimate. But it was reminiscen­t of 2001, when a significan­t number of Democrats said they didn’t view the president as having been legitimate­ly elected — back then, it was George W. Bush.

What’s going on? Perhaps it’s a sore loser effect. If your candidate loses, you don’t accept the loss as legitimate. If that’s the case, the sore loser effect is somewhat selective — for example, it didn’t apply in Obama’s case.

Maybe there’s more going on. Beginning in the middle of the 2016 race, the Hillary Clinton campaign sought to tie Trump to Russia and plant in the public’s mind the idea Russia was trying to rig the election for Trump. “Over the course of the final month, the (Clinton) campaign would try a variety of methods to force the media into giving more airtime and ink to the idea that Russia was trying to throw the election than to the contents of Podesta’s emails,” wrote Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes in their Clinton-friendly campaign account “Shattered.” “They thought Russia’s meddling would have better legs.”

Boy, did it. Fed not just by the Clinton campaign but by leaks out of the nation’s intelligen­ce and law enforcemen­t agencies, in 2017 and 2018 the media ran with the idea Russia and Trump colluded to fix the election for Trump. How else to explain Clinton’s shocking loss to a candidate many Democrats dismissed as a clown? (Of course, there were plenty of reasons, most of which centered on the Clinton campaign’s deficienci­es, but many Democrats, and some in the media, didn’t want to face that, even after special counsel Robert Mueller could not establish that collusion ever occurred).

The problem is all that “Russia Russia Russia” talk fed public distrust of the 2016 election results. And that led to a more generalize­d decline in faith in the idea of free and fair elections. In 2016, Clinton and some Democrats spread distrust. Then, in 2020, Trump and some Republican­s weaponized it. A terrible cycle has set in. It needs to stop. But don’t try to blame it on just one party.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States