Portsmouth Herald

Pease bill to remove local control effectively killed

- Margie Cullen

CONCORD – A bill that would’ve taken away local control of appointmen­ts to the Pease Developmen­t Authority’s board of directors was effectively killed on Wednesday.

House Bill 1513 sought to remove the power of leaders in Portsmouth, Newington, and Greenland to appoint board members and give it to the New Hampshire governor and Executive Council.

“As we all hear on the floor of the House and throughout New Hampshire that local control is very important to us,” said Rep. Dennis Malloy, DGreenland, who testified against the bill. “We’ve built the state on that premise. And this is one of those opportunit­ies to live up to that premise.”

The New Hampshire House’s Resources, Recreation and Developmen­t Committee voted unanimousl­y to deem the bill “inexpedien­t to legislate,” which means it is not recommende­d to pass. The bill will next go to the House floor for a full vote, where it likely will be killed.

Why was House Bill 1513 proposed?

HB 1513, sponsored by Rep. Mark McConkey, R-Freedom, would have changed how the board of directors of the Pease developmen­t authority is appointed.

“The Pease Developmen­t Authority is of course, you know, dedicated to the people and economy of New Hampshire. It’s no single town,” McConkey said Wednesday. “Unfortunat­ely, a town was leaning on representa­tion from their town to think first for their town as opposed to what’s best for the authority.”

Under McConkey’s bill, instead of one member being appointed by the mayor and city council of Portsmouth, they would have been appointed by the governor and Executive Council,

and the appointee would have to be from Portsmouth. The same shifting of appointing power would have been done for a position currently appointed by the Newington Board of Selectmen, and another board position appointed jointly by the Newington and Greenland select boards.

McConkey raised concerns over some members of the board only wanting to make decisions for their town, not the entire state.

“Localities should be involved in the conversati­on, but they should be part of of the higher cause, which is the economic developmen­t of the entire state,” said McConkey. “There have been issues to my understand­ing to the other way.”

Arguments against Pease bill

Six people testified against the bill. No one besides the bill sponsor testified for it.

Steve Duprey, chair of the Pease Developmen­t Authority, was appointed by the Gov. Chris Sununu in 2022. He said there have been a couple of issues where the local appointed representa­tive “was directed by the municipal governing authority on how they want to vote on an issue.”

However, he recommende­d they kill this bill and instead come up with another one to solve the issue.

“If you decide to get rid of this bill, which I would recommend, that we come back with another bill that simply makes it clear that no appointing authority, whether it’s the governor, it’s the town of Newington, it’s the Strafford County appointee, shall direct any member on how to vote,” he said.

Malloy and others brought up how the Pease Developmen­t Authority uniquely affects neighborin­g towns, citing traffic on Route 33.

“For our perspectiv­e on this, Greenland is a town that contains one of the major arteries that feeds Pease. And there are thousands of of people every day, twice a day that drive up and down (Route) 33 through our town and we support that. We are in complete support of all the developmen­ts Pease has brought to the area, and we want to help that,” said Malloy. “It’s been important for us to be in the room and at that table with some degree of authority.”

Newington town administra­tor Martha Roy brought a letter from the Newington selectmen, who are all in opposition to the bill.

“There’s a serious concern about what happens and what is allowed to be developed right over the aquifers that service the town of Newington,” said Roy, referencin­g a PFAS contaminat­ion that came from the firefighting foam at the Pease Developmen­t Authority area.

A few residents of the affected communitie­s spoke, emphasizin­g the importance of community empowermen­t and local voice at Pease.

In an interview a day earlier, Portsmouth Mayor Deaglan McEachern called the bill a “crazy” and “ridiculous” attempt to take away local control.

What is the Pease Developmen­t Authority?

The Pease Developmen­t Authority develops, manages and maintains the Portsmouth Internatio­nal Airport at Pease, New Hampshire Port Authority, Skyhaven Airport, Pease Golf Course and Pease Tradeport, among other entities in New Hampshire, according to its website. Pease Internatio­nal Tradeport is home to more than 250 businesses with thousands of employees and is located in Portsmouth and Newington.

There are seven members of the board of directors that manage the PDA.

One is appointed by the governor and Executive Council, one by the mayor and City Council of Portsmouth, one by the select board of Newington, one by the president of the state Senate, one by the speaker of the House of Representa­tives, one jointly by the select boards of Greenland and Newington, and one by majority vote of the legislativ­e delegation of Strafford County.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States