Post-Tribune

Discoverin­g the true heart of zinfandel

- By Eric Asimov

The comment from Preston G. of San Francisco seemed dismissive and definitive. Over the last month, as this column has been exploring zinfandels that were a step back from the popular over-the-top blockbuste­r style, he wrote: “Restrained is not authentic to the variety.”

Here at Wine School, expression­s of historical certainty about wine generally arouse suspicions, as do assertions of authentici­ty. They are almost always wrong, yet nonetheles­s valuable in provoking discussion­s.

Determinin­g the authentici­ty of any product is never an easy task. It’s particular­ly difficult with wine. Its production is largely specialize­d, with few accessible records to testify to the techniques and goals of long-ago vignerons.

The question of authentici­ty is especially perplexing in the New World, where decisions about which grapes to plant and what style of wine to make were often entreprene­urial or commercial rather than cultural.

Even so, if you are producing cabernet sauvignon in California or pinot noir in Oregon, you can at least consult historic references, like Bordeaux and Burgundy.

If you are making zinfandel, however, you are for the most part on your own. Although zinfandel has been shown to be geneticall­y identical to tribidrag, a Croatian grape, and to primitivo, from the Puglia region of Italy, no definitive Old World blueprint existed for early zinfandel producers. Free from the dictates of well-known styles, they were able to follow their own muses.

Nonetheles­s, old zinfandel vineyards, as Eric of Capitol Hill, D.C., pointed out, do offer a few clues about what long-ago wine producers were thinking.

Preston G. cited Italian immigrants in California in the 19th and early 20th centuries who planted zinfandel, often in concert with other grapes. Some of these vineyards survive to this day, and are cherished and protected as heirlooms, while giving us some idea of how these farmers imagined their wines.

Zinfandel, for all its alluring qualities of spicy fruit flavors, can, depending on the vintage, lack other attributes. It is not always sufficient­ly tannic, for example, so these old farmers made sure as well to plant petite sirah, a notably tannic variety.

But these long-ago farmers, with their Old World experience, anticipate­d problems with more natural solutions. As today’s cliché has it, those old wines were truly made in the vineyard.

Still, we don’t know much about how their wines smelled, tasted or felt in the mouth. And zinfandel producers cannot point to Old World cultural traditions, even if the immigrants who planted these old vineyards were in a sense trying to conjure up the wines they’d enjoyed in southern Italy or wherever they originated.

But history tells us that zinfandel can be a lot of things, depending, as with so many wines, on the intent of the producer. Our aim in exploring a more restrained set of zinfandels was simply to examine the wine made from a different point of view.

As usual, I picked three examples. They were: Broc Cellars Vine Starr Sonoma County Zinfandel 2018, Maître de Chai Clements Hills Stampede Vineyard Zinfandel 2017 and Dashe Cellars Vineyard Select California Zinfandel 2018.

The alcohol content ranged from Broc’s 12.8% to Maître de Chai’s 14.2% to Dashe’s 14.5%.

While wines above 14% alcohol may not seem restrained, in the context of zinfandel, where wines have often topped 16% and even hit 17%, restraint is a relative thing.

Even among these wines, the difference­s in character were profound. The Broc was bright, fresh and nervy, with aromas and flavors of flowers and spicy fruit. Acidity was its defining quality. It was tangy, lightly tart and deliciousl­y refreshing.

Chris Brockway, the winemaker, says Vine Starr was inspired by the wines of Beaujolais and the Northern Rhône. For me, Beaujolais was most evident in its snappy, juicy vibrancy and simple, easy-to-digest drinkabili­ty.

The Dashe, at 14.5% alcohol, was rounder and richer, yet pretty, with bright, spicy, floral flavors. It was extremely wellbalanc­ed and reminded me of an excellent Southern Rhône blend, although the producers, Mike and Anne Dashe, say only that they were aiming for a “bistro wine,” a bottle made to go well with food.

Unlike the Vine Starr, which was 100% zinfandel, the Dashe included 6% petite sirah, which may account for its lightly tannic texture, and 5% teroldego, a northern Italian grape that paired seamlessly with the others.

The third bottle, from Maître de Chai — French for cellar master — stood out. It was a single-vineyard wine, unlike the others, from grapes grown on decomposed granite soils in Clement Hills, a small viticultur­al area in the southeast part of Lodi.

The other two wines, regardless of the intent, were varietal wines, defined by the characteri­stics of the grape as expressed by their producers. The Maître de Chai, though, seemed to be a wine of a particular place, earthier and more mineral, with focused fruit and floral flavors and a pleasant touch of tannin. As with the Dashe, several other grapes like mission, grenache and mourvèdre were part of the blend, though the producers were not explicit about the precise mix.

As different as the bottles were, I thought each was an excellent example of zinfandel’s potential in a variety of styles.

By and large, readers seem to enjoy zinfandel, although some pushed back against my aversion to high-alcohol bottles.

Readers also offered plenty of suggestion­s of favorite producers, which I very much appreciate­d. Alex Seizew of Ojai, California, even suggested a white zinfandel from Turley, which happens to be an excellent bottle, dry and refreshing.

As far as these wines went, however, opinions flew in all directions. Martina Mirandola Mullen of New York likened the Maître de Chai to an elegant Bordeaux blend, but George Erdle of Charlotte, North Carolina, said it was syrupy and disjointed. His dining group enjoyed the Dashe best, and seconded my suggestion, calling it Rhône-like.

Jerry Pendzick of Jacksonvil­le, Oregon, said the Broc reminded him of a watery pinot noir. But Martin Schappeit of Forest, Virginia, took my recommenda­tion and tried a 2015 Broc with a recipe for orange beef.

“This food fits this wine like Cinderella’s foot fit the shoe,” he said. “I was sitting down and thought in a sentimenta­l moment: This is an American wine and I love it.”

 ?? PEPE SERRA/ THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Debating authentici­ty in wine is often pointless, especially with New World wines, and that leaves more options for producers, who are free to surprise.
PEPE SERRA/ THE NEW YORK TIMES Debating authentici­ty in wine is often pointless, especially with New World wines, and that leaves more options for producers, who are free to surprise.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States