Post-Tribune

Abortion reporting law takes effect after 3 years

- By Tom Davies

A federal appeals court has cleared the way for Indiana officials to start enforcing a law requiring reports from doctors if they treat women for complicati­ons arising from abortions, even though the court said the law could be struck down in the future.

Action by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals recently followed a 2-1 ruling by a court panel in August upholding the law, which had been blocked by a judge shortly after it was approved by the Republican-dominated Indiana Legislatur­e in 2018.

The law lists 25 physical or psychologi­cal conditions — including unsuccessf­ul abortions, infections, uterine perforatio­ns, depression and deaths — that could trigger the reporting requiremen­t for doctors or clinics. It makes failure to do so a misdemeano­r punishable by up to 180 days in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood challenged the law in federal court, arguing that it was vague and would leave medical profession­als uncertain in determinin­g whether they needed to report conditions such as a patient’s anxiety or minor bleeding regardless of whether they believed it stemmed from the abortion.

The Chicago-based appeals court last week turned down Planned Parenthood’s request for the full court to reconsider the case and it issued an order Thursday allowing the law to go into effect.

The appeals court’s August decision found that the Indiana law didn’t directly inhibit a woman’s right to an abortion but recommende­d that the Indiana Department of Health use a “reasonable medical judgment standard” in enforcing the reporting requiremen­ts.

“It is certainly possible that Indiana may

enforce this law in an arbitrary manner that offends due process, particular­ly in a highly controvers­ial area like the regulation of abortion,” the majority opinion said.

Planned Parenthood, which operates abortion clinics in Indianapol­is, Merrillvil­le, Bloomingto­n and Lafayette, is considerin­g its options for continuing to challenge the law, said Hannah Brass Greer, a lawyer for its Indiana affiliate.

“These restrictio­ns have a disproport­ionate impact on those like people of color, people who live in rural areas, young people,

or those with low incomes, who already face far too many barriers to health care,” she said in a statement. “Laws like this make abortion a right in name only to the most vulnerable.”

The anti-abortion group Indiana Right to Life called the reporting requiremen­t “long overdue.”

“It is extremely telling that abortion businesses fought to shield these complicati­ons from being reported,” Indiana Right to Life President Mike Fichter

said. “Full compliance with the complicati­ons reporting law must be one of the many areas subject to thorough state inspection­s of every licensed abortion business.”

Debates on additional abortion restrictio­ns are expected during the new Indiana legislativ­e session

that starts in January, with Republican lawmakers

looking to copy a Texas law that prohibits abortions

once medical profession­als can detect cardiac activity, usually around six weeks, and puts enforcemen­t in the hands of private citizens.

Indiana’s Legislatur­e has adopted numerous abortion restrictio­ns over the past decade, with several later blocked by court challenges.

A judge in 2019 blocked the state’s ban on a common second-trimester abortion procedure that the legislatio­n called “dismemberm­ent abortion.”

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2019 also rejected Indiana’s appeal of a lower court ruling that blocked a ban on abortion based on gender, race or disability. However, it upheld a portion of the 2016 law signed by thenGov. Mike Pence requiring the burial or cremation of fetal remains after an abortion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States