Post-Tribune

Southern Baptist moral meltdown

- David Brooks Brooks is a columnist for The New York Times.

They dedicated their lives to a gospel that says that every human being is made in the image of God. They dedicated their lives to a creed that commands one to look out for the marginaliz­ed, the vulnerable. The last shall be first. The meek shall inherit the Earth.

And yet when allegation­s of sexual abuse came, the leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention betrayed it all. Those men — and they seem to have all been men — must have listened to hundreds of hours of pious sermons, read hundreds of high-minded theologica­l books, recited thousands of hours of prayer, and yet all those true teachings and good beliefs had no effect on their actual behavior.

Instead, according to an independen­tly produced report released by the convention this week, those leaders covered up widespread abuse in their denominati­on and often intimidate­d and belittled victims. More than 400 people believed to be affiliated with the church, including some church leaders, have been accused of committing abuse.

One woman, Jennifer Lyell, said she’d been sexually abused while a student at a Southern Baptist seminary. In an article, the church’s communicat­ions arm made it sound as if she were confessing to a consensual affair. Paige Patterson, then the head of one seminary, told one student not to report a rape, according to the report, and later, at another seminary, “emailed his intention to meet with another student who had reported an assault, with no other officials present, so he could ‘break her down.’ ”

Those leaders’ stated beliefs and sacred creeds had zero effect on their actual behavior, just as similar creeds and beliefs had zero effect on the Catholic bishops who behaved in much the same way when they learned of abuses years ago.

How can there be such a chasm between what people “believe” and what they do? Don’t our beliefs matter?

The fact is, moral behavior doesn’t start with having the right beliefs. Moral behavior starts with an act — the act of seeing the full humanity of other people. Moral behavior is not about having the right intellectu­al concepts in your head. It’s about seeing other people with the eyes of the heart, seeing them in their full experience, suffering with their full suffering, walking with them on their path. Morality starts with the quality of attention we cast upon another.

If you look at people with a detached, emotionles­s gaze, it doesn’t really matter what your beliefs are, because you have morally disengaged. You have perceived a person not as a full human but as a thing, as a vague entity toward which the rules of morality do not apply.

In 2007, a woman named Christa Brown had the courage to testify before Southern Baptist officials that her youth pastor had repeatedly sexually assaulted her when she was 16. She reported that one official turned his back, literally refusing to look at her, refusing to see her.

That is the sort of dehumaniza­tion that creates indifferen­ce that enables rape, abuse and all the other horrific dehumanizi­ng acts down the road.

Character is not measured by a person’s beliefs but by the ability to see the full humanity of others. It is not automatic.

It’s a skill acquired slowly. It’s about being able to focus on what’s going on in your own mind and simultaneo­usly focus on what’s going on in another mind. It’s about learning how to minutely observe, absorb and resonate with other people’s emotions.

It comes about through years of shared experience­s, decades of other-centered attention, engagement with the kind of literature that educates you in what can go on in other people’s heads. It’s spiritual training to get out of your own egotistic self-referentia­l thinking and into the habit of asking what’s this moment like for that other person.

As social scientists have shown in one experiment after another, it’s very easy to get people to dehumanize each other. You divide people into in-groups and out-groups. You spread a tacit ideology that says women are less important than men or Black people are less important than white people. You use euphemisti­c language so that horrific acts can be abstracted into sanitized jargon.

You tell a victimizat­ion story: We are under attack. They’re out to get us. They’re monsters. They deserve what they get.

You tell a righteousn­ess story: We do the Lord’s work. Our mission is vital. Anybody who interferes is a beast.

You bureaucrat­ize: You create a system of nonrespons­ibility in which rules and procedures matter, not people. When you read the report on the Southern Baptists you realize, once again, how much horror can be done by dutiful functionar­ies who focus on minimizing legal liabilitie­s but not honoring human beings.

We’re living in a period awash in cruelty — not only with abuse scandals, but also with mass shootings, political barbarism and the atrocities in Ukraine. How much will the pummeling act of experienci­ng the news these days lead to empathy erosion? Where will the forces of rehumaniza­tion come from? Apparently not from our religious elites.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States